How to reply to blog entries

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Ray A

Re: Re:

Post by _Ray A »

TAK wrote:
I guess DCP did not like my stating the obvious.


Now you can say "I've been highly acknowledged by DCP".
_TAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:47 pm

Re: Re:

Post by _TAK »

Ray A wrote:
Now you can say "I've been highly acknowledged by DCP".


I could .. But I don't think I will.
God has the right to create and to destroy, to make like and to kill. He can delegate this authority if he wishes to. I know that can be scary. Deal with it.
Nehor.. Nov 08, 2010


_________________
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Re:

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

silentkid wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:I don't understand the joke. A little help, please?

Tak said something that Dr. Peterson didn't like in another thread and now he's trying to derail everything with this "acknowledge TAK" thing. It's really funny.

That's correct. On a thread that was largely about me, TAK declared that I like things to be about me. So, in order to make sure that it was about me, I decided to deflect attention to TAK because, by derailing a thread that's largely about me to an acknowledgment of TAK, I divert the thread that's largely about me to being principally about me. Fortunately, The Dude came on to another thread that was explicitly about me in order to point out that he avoids and ignores threads about me. So, now that I've diverted the thread that was largely about me to being mostly about me by cleverly acknowledging TAK, The Dude may continue to avoid and ignore it by posting on it. Or not.

It's all so very confusing.

And, of course, deeply troubling.
_TAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:47 pm

Re: Re:

Post by _TAK »

Daniel Peterson wrote:That's correct. On a thread that was largely about me, TAK declared that I like things to be about me. So, in order to make sure that it was about me, I decided to deflect attention to TAK because, by derailing a thread that's largely about me to an acknowledgment of TAK, I divert the thread that's largely about me to being principally about me. Fortunately, The Dude came on to another thread that was explicitly about me in order to point out that he avoids and ignores threads about me. So, now that I've diverted the thread that was largely about me to being mostly about me by cleverly acknowledging TAK, The Dude may continue to avoid and ignore it by posting on it. Or not.

It's all so very confusing.

And, of course, deeply troubling.


I am honored to be acknowleged by the great and powerful DCP...

So how many classes are you teaching this fall?
God has the right to create and to destroy, to make like and to kill. He can delegate this authority if he wishes to. I know that can be scary. Deal with it.
Nehor.. Nov 08, 2010


_________________
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Re:

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

TAK wrote:So how many classes are you teaching this fall?

Two.

How many are you teaching?
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Re: How to reply to blog entries

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

Dr. Peterson, by telling us to acknowledge TAK, has deviously turned this thread into a thread about himself. Oh, he's good.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: How to reply to blog entries

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Mwahahahaha.
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Re: How to reply to blog entries

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

Image
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
Post Reply