Good Lord

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Good Lord

Post by _moksha »

Scottie wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote: Bless you, Scottie. You have an unenviable task.


If THAT isn't the understatement of the year!!! :)


Scottie, keep up the good work. I want to see Shades experiment succeed. We have an overbalance of gunslingers and too few school marms for our own good. Make this a place that Blixa, Truthdancer and Charity can feel good enough about to post.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: Good Lord

Post by _wenglund »

Mister Scratch wrote:Wade, I am not the one who floated the ridiculous argument that criticizing the Church is the same as criticizing you, or President Hinckley, or any other TBM. I think it is perfectly fine and valid to criticize the Church and/or its leaders, and I don't think that necessarily reflects on the individual members. It is *you* who (apparently) supports that view.


Straw man alert!!....followed by a "you missed the point" alert!!

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Good Lord

Post by _The Nehor »

Mister Scratch wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
You mean the one reported with a Gordon Hinckley and whom the original source of the report said himself that it was not that Hinckley.



Provide a source and we can discuss it.


You made the accusation. You first.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Post Reply