A few questions about the ark

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: A few questions about the ark

Post by _harmony »

The Nehor wrote:Okay, an old story based on real events subjected to hyperbole and people with religious devotion magnifying the event as it went through multiple hands. The thing is....the suckers forgot to take out the part about the birds.....thus showing that even Noah himself didn't know where he was or IF there was land out there.


In other words: myth. Welcome to the world of the Old Testament.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: A few questions about the ark

Post by _harmony »

squawkeye wrote:Even with Angels magically shovelling elephant poop you have a really big bunch of animals to be taken care of.


Okay, that was funny! :lol:
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: A few questions about the ark

Post by _The Nehor »

harmony wrote:
The Nehor wrote:Okay, an old story based on real events subjected to hyperbole and people with religious devotion magnifying the event as it went through multiple hands. The thing is....the suckers forgot to take out the part about the birds.....thus showing that even Noah himself didn't know where he was or IF there was land out there.


In other words: myth. Welcome to the world of the Old Testament.


I'm willing to commit historically to there being a guy named Noah and some kind of calamity hitting the area where he lived.

If the rest is myth fine. I have no problem with myths. In fact, I like them.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: A few questions about the ark

Post by _harmony »

The Nehor wrote:
I'm willing to commit historically to there being a guy named Noah and some kind of calamity hitting the area where he lived.

If the rest is myth fine. I have no problem with myths. In fact, I like them.


I, on the other hand, am willing to commit to a rain storm in or around that particular desert.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: A few questions about the ark

Post by _Jersey Girl »

You know, the first thread I ever participated in was about Noah's Ark and I'd hate to tell you who was on the other side of me when I was trying to defend it at the time!

Trevor wrote:The people at CARM take this very seriously:

Quote:
Classification . . . . Number of Species . . . . Number of Kinds on the Ark
Mammals . . . . . . . . .3,700 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,700 (a few live in water).
Birds . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,600 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,200 (seven pairs according to
Gen. 7:3)
Reptiles. . . . . . . . . . .6,300 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,300
Amphibians. . . . . . . .2,500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,500
Fishes. . . . . . . . . . . .20,600. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .zero
Other marine life . . . 192,605. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .zero
Insects . . . . . . . . . . . 850,000 . . . (Since insects are very small, and a great many could be stored in a small area, calculation would be difficult.)
Total . . . . . . . . . . . .1,072,305 . . . . . . . . . . . . .72,700
The total number of mammals would be 3,700 times two pair which equals 7,400 animals. 7,400 divided by 240 = 31 boxcars used.
Since Gen. 7:3 says to take seven pairs of every bird then the total for birds would be 8,600 times two pair times 7 or 120,400 animals. 120,400 ÷ 480 = 250 boxcars. The reptiles and amphibians would be 6,300 plus 2,500 or 8,800. 8,800 times two pair equals 17,600 animals. 17,600 divided by 480 = 37 boxcars.
The total number of boxcars used would be 318 with a total number of animals at 145,400. There would be 251 boxcars left over. That means that only 56% of the ark would be used for storing the animals. Obviously, then, the rest of the space would be used for food for the people and animals and sleeping quarters. In addition, considering that insects are extremely small, it is easily conceivable that they could be housed in part of the remaining space.
It should also be considered that many animals can hibernate. Additionally, predators and prey have been known to habitat peacefully together during situations of stress like fire, flood, or earthquake. In the Ark, normal animal behavior would probably have been different from normal. Specialists in animal behavior have noted that animals can sense danger and have often migrated to escape it. Perhaps God used their migratory instincts to get them to the Ark.
Though this is only a brief analysis, it should present enough evidence that the Ark account is certainly within the realm of possibility.


Trevor, if the he good folks at CARM based the above on worldwide species/kinds then they can't read or think.

Nowhere in the Bible does it indicate a "global" flood.

Whittle that down to regional species/kinds and then I think we might have something realistic to work with.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Ray A

Re: A few questions about the ark

Post by _Ray A »

And after going through all that trouble to save the animals, what does Noah do?

15 And God spake unto Noah, saying,
16 Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons’ wives with thee.
17 Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.
18 And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons’ wives with him:
19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark.
20 And Noah builded an altar unto the Lord; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.


Perhaps he brought some "extras" for the sacrificing. So the poor animals spend 371 days at sea and escape the deluge, only to be burnt.
_Ray A

Re: A few questions about the ark

Post by _Ray A »

Jersey Girl wrote:Nowhere in the Bible does it indicate a "global" flood.


How do you explain this, Jersey Girl?

4 And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.


From Wiki:

An obvious problem associated with identifying the resting place of the Ark is that its elevation must be lower than the ultimate depth of the flood water, since the Biblical account indicates that the highest point of land was covered to a depth of about twenty feet. An elevation higher than a certain point would require an impossible rate of rainfall to cover it. In the view of some biblical literalists[who?], is dubious that a peak of over 16,000 feet would even exist at the time of the Flood; hence the facts imply that the mountains of "Ararat" were much lower than today, even if they were the highest in the world, a position not supported by modern geomorphology.


If it doesn't fit, then lower the mountains.

Mt. Ararat:

Image
Last edited by _Ray A on Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
_Master Bates
_Emeritus
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:43 am

Re: A few questions about the ark

Post by _Master Bates »

All these facts, questions and logic.

C'mon. Where is your faith?
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: A few questions about the ark

Post by _bcspace »

"Make it a limited flood and assume Noah was just taking critical livestock to rebuild herds after the flood and it gets much easier."

Trouble is, that is not what the Scriptures say.


Trouble again is that you may have to factor in their pov. From their pov, certainly everything was destroyed. But was it really? Consider Lot's daughters. They thought that with the destruction of Sodom they were the only ones left in the world and subsequently used their father as a sperm bank and made some withdrawals.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: A few questions about the ark

Post by _Jersey Girl »

bcspace wrote:
"Make it a limited flood and assume Noah was just taking critical livestock to rebuild herds after the flood and it gets much easier."



Trouble again is that you may have to factor in their pov. From their pov, certainly everything was destroyed. But was it really? Consider Lot's daughters. They thought that with the destruction of Sodom they were the only ones left in the world and subsequently used their father as a sperm bank and made some withdrawals.


I cut out the "not what the scriptures say" quote. I don't know who said that and I'm too lazy to look for it.

bc, you are exactly correct. The ancients told the story from their point of view and I've stated that previously on this board. Their point of view, what constituted the world is exactly how the story should be viewed. That we know that the rest of "the world" exists is exactly the WRONG point of reference.

The only point of reference that makes sense is what "the world" was through the eyes of the ancients.

Why does no one get that?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply