Rollo Tomasi wrote:I was simply sharing my opinion that the Gen'l YW presidency was snubbed in this particular letter. You obviously disagree, going so far as to cite to a different letter you saw 15 years ago. Ergo, since you brought up the comparison to support your claim, the burden falls on you to establish the fact. No passing the buck, friend.
Then I'll just call your argument unsubstantiated and move on. Bye.
As you wish ....
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
Well, I see that this is par for the course as far as The Nehor is concerned. He seems to have a bad habit of claiming to have "seen" some bit of evidence (which, coincidentally, he can never reproduce; he always relies purely on his "memory") which neatly contradicts the opposing point of view. Wow, I ought to adopt that tactic! Can you imagine what my critiques of Mopologics would be like if I magically "remembered" all these things I saw and read ages ago---all of which very conveniently supported my arguments?
Oh, wait---that's right. If I did that, people would regard me in much the same way they regard The Nehor.
