Off Topic Comments from Book of Mormon Authorship Thread

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Book of Mormon authorship project is online

Post by _Jersey Girl »

LifeOnaPlate wrote:

"That" indicating the MAD board, not this one, Jersey Girl.


Woops, you got me!
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Re: Book of Mormon authorship project is online

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

Jersey Girl wrote:
LifeOnaPlate wrote:

"That" indicating the MAD board, not this one, Jersey Girl.


Woops, you got me!


It was unintentional, I assure you.
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
_marg

Re: Book of Mormon authorship project is online

Post by _marg »

LifeOnaPlate wrote:
No thanks. One of the reasons I decided not to continue here is because a certain mod has taken it upon him/herself to police me, threaten to delete some of my posts, and otherwise get on my nerves while I am trying to discuss things with Dale. With that, I take leave on this issue from this board. Thanks for listening.


Following a brief discussion I had the other morning with Dale in this thread you posted a one-liner nonsense comment post which included quotes so the post was larger than one line..something to the effect that 'spalding witnesses were probably aliens". I wrote a personal reprimand post not acting as a mod, asking you to respect Dale's time and efforts in this, and not fill up posts with nonsense. You responded with a one word of "oops" but also a post including quotes. So I thought there was a lot of wasted space with no substance to the issues added and in your best interest and others it best to remove all 3 posts, 2 yours , one mine, which only served to waste time and space. I informed you of this in pm and also informed you if you so wished you could add back your one liner though I would again comment to it.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Book of Mormon authorship project is online

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Request to moderators: I would like to see this lengthy thread remain on topic. If it's not asking too much, could a moderator comb back through the last 3-4 pages, weed out the off topic exchanges and split them off into their own thread? Please take this post along with the off topic exchanges that you find.

Thanks,
Jersey Girl
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Yoda

Re: Book of Mormon authorship project is online

Post by _Yoda »

Hey, Jersey Girl...I'm off to bed soon, but I'll take care of it tomorrow. :wink:
_Yoda

Re: Book of Mormon authorship project is online

Post by _Yoda »

liz3564 wrote:Hey, Jersey Girl...I'm off to bed soon, but I'll take care of it tomorrow. :wink:


Task completed. :wink:

Anyone who has any questions regarding this split are welcome to PM me.

Liz


Image
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Off Topic Comments from Book of Mormon Authorship Thread

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Looks good. Thanks, Liz!

And yes, if you guys would monitor the pinned thread, that would be great.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Yoda

Re: Book of Mormon authorship project is online

Post by _Yoda »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
harmony wrote:No wonder the apologists are reacting as predicted. They do so hate your theory, and to have it raise its head again, with evidence confirming your conclusions... man, that's got to sting.

You haven't yet seen a serious response from "apologists." It hasn't yet appeared.

(And my prediction, harmony, is that you won't read it when it does.)


I disagree. Harmony interacts with you, and certainly reads your comments on a regular basis. I consider you a serious apologist, and, I think I can safely speak for Harmony in this regard as well.

I know that I would be very interested in any contributions to this thread that you care to share.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Book of Mormon authorship project is online

Post by _harmony »

liz3564 wrote:I disagree. Harmony interacts with you, and certainly reads your comments on a regular basis. I consider you a serious apologist, and, I think I can safely speak for Harmony in this regard as well.

I know that I would be very interested in any contributions to this thread that you care to share.


He's not going to share, Liz. I'd like it if he'd share, because I'd like to know what God's own apologist thinks, but he's not going to share. He's not going to discuss it at all, at least not here, and probably not anywhere else that's accessible by the public. He's going to say that he won't discuss it for (insert lame excuse here) reason, but really, he's not going to discuss it because 1) this is MDB and his argument would be put under a microscope, 2) he is waiting on his friends to write the response, and 3) fear.

Dang, the cat is amongst the pigeons now. I wonder how many will fly?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Book of Mormon authorship project is online

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Mods again: I hate to be a nag but could you remove the off topic DCP back and forth remarks made by the following posters from this thread?

DCP
Liz
harmony

Sorry! I really want to see this thread stay on topic or related sub topics. If you choose to relocate the remarks in question, please take this request post with them.

Humbly and naggishly yours,
Jersey Girl
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply