liz3564 wrote:As far as serious discussion, yes, it occurs here as well. Jersey Girl's thread regarding Book of Mormon authorship is a serious discussion.
I don't deny that, apart from the bottom dwellers, there are some more or less lucid people here. But you can't really describe Jersey Girl's thread as particularly balanced, I don't think.
liz3564 wrote:There is also serious discussion occurring on my thread, which you chose to participate in. Thank you for your comments there, by the way.
liz3564 wrote:As far as serious discussion, yes, it occurs here as well. Jersey Girl's thread regarding Book of Mormon authorship is a serious discussion.
I don't deny that, apart from the bottom dwellers, there are some more or less lucid people here.
That is probably the best lefthanded backstabbing compliment I've ever seen you make.
But you can't really describe Jersey Girl's thread as particularly balanced, I don't think.
She didn't say it was balanced. She said it was serious.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
I love this board. Where else could we see Pumpo the Clown, a tenured professor at an esteemed university, let his true character shine through the layers of Mormon lard he carries around? It amuses me to no end to see the same person who cons others into believing he's a serious academic muck around in the mud with all the pigs (true to his nature, of course). The perfect exmaple of Mormonism manifest. I love it.