the efficacy of FARMS/MI's apologetic work

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: the efficacy of FARMS/MI's apologetic work

Post by _Gadianton »

Why wouldn't he be?
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: the efficacy of FARMS/MI's apologetic work

Post by _harmony »

I'd still like to see a few examples of MI studies/published papers/something that is produced by Mi that is opposed to the mission statement, #1 and #4.

Just saying.




.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply