Our newest member, Wayneman: Shades' missionary companion??

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Wayneman
_Emeritus
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:42 pm

Re: Our newest member, Wayneman: Shades' missionary companion??

Post by _Wayneman »

I am vulnerable in ways Shades is not. He's done his best to protect me; I try to return the favor. Carry on.


Vulnerable to what? The Mormon Mafia?

Give me a break.
_Bond James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 2690
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm

Re: Our newest member, Wayneman: Shades' missionary companion??

Post by _Bond James Bond »

*B23 ponders his own safety :confused: *

Anyway, welcome Wayneman.




(hopefully fat gay dating ads)
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07

MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Our newest member, Wayneman: Shades' missionary companion??

Post by _harmony »

Wayneman wrote:
I am vulnerable in ways Shades is not. He's done his best to protect me; I try to return the favor. Carry on.


Vulnerable to what? The Mormon Mafia?

Give me a break.


Perhaps you should ask Shades. Your ignorance is showing.

My TR is as good as yours, and that causes some folks who frequent this place a considerable amount of angst... enough, that if they knew my real name, they'd seek to cause mischief in my real life.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Wayneman
_Emeritus
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:42 pm

Re: Our newest member, Wayneman: Shades' missionary companion??

Post by _Wayneman »

Perhaps you should ask Shades. Your ignorance is showing.

My TR is as good as yours, and that causes some folks who frequent this place a considerable amount of angst... enough, that if they knew my real name, they'd seek to cause mischief in my real life.


Perhaps I am ignorant, Harmony. But it is apparent that you think very highly of yourself in that cryptic tone of yours.

I actually feel sorry for you, living in that paranoid little world of yours. Must be some life, eh, being all cloak-and-dagger about everything.

And frankly, I don't care what your real name is. Even if it was "Thomas S. Monson", I'll let God be the judge.

At any rate, I never intended for this to become the "love-fest" it has become, so I will say no more on the matter, Harmony. Nor will I address you again. I've said all I needed to, to you.

Shades - I'm sorry if I stirred things up. But please tell me that a guy like Harmony doesn't pull your strings.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Our newest member, Wayneman: Shades' missionary companion??

Post by _harmony »

Wayneman wrote:Perhaps I am ignorant, Harmony. But it is apparent that you think very highly of yourself in that cryptic tone of yours.


And you think very highly of yourself with your expectation of special treatment.

I actually feel sorry for you, living in that paranoid little world of yours. Must be some life, eh, being all cloak-and-dagger about everything.


Paranoia strikes deep in the heartland, but I think it's all overdone. And so is your analysis.

And frankly, I don't care what your real name is. Even if it was "Thomas S. Monson", I'll let God be the judge.


And I don't care what yours is. But there are those here who will use any weapon.

At any rate, I never intended for this to become the "love-fest" it has become, so I will say no more on the matter, Harmony. Nor will I address you again. I've said all I needed to, to you.


Unintended consequences.

Shades - I'm sorry if I stirred things up. But please tell me that a guy like Harmony doesn't pull your strings.


Now see, there ya go, assuming again. How many guys would use a nick like harmony?

Nobody pulls Shades' strings, least of all me. Did you think you were his only friend here?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_msnobody
_Emeritus
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:28 am

Re: Our newest member, Wayneman: Shades' missionary companion??

Post by _msnobody »

Welcome to the board, Wayneman. I'm happy you found it and also finding Shades.
"The Lord is near to all who call on him, to all who call on him in truth. He fulfills the desire of those who fear him; he also hears their cry and saves them.” Psalm 145:18-19 ESV
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: Our newest member, Wayneman: Shades' missionary companion??

Post by _Gadianton »

So here's the play-by-play.

Harmony (female) says it's good not to use real names here. The context of years of board feuds escapes Wayne -- imagine that -- and Wayne mistakenly thinks she's refering to evil covert operations of a LDS SCMC-like org. While the SCMC is real, evil, and highly connected to apologetics, that wasn't what she was talking about, but rather, the more mundane oaf-like evil of a group of mid-tier to junior apologists -- Internet Mormons who could barely be regarded as Mormon at all and generally lacking the graduate degrees of FARMS -- probably now on MAD (another board) that began posting personal things about Shades publically. So hence, better to be anonymous. So Wayne, sort of on a quick draw, misunderstood Harmony. And then Harmony, instead of corrected Wayne and giving hime a chance to see what she really meant, uses the opportunity to feign an attack on her own member status and pulls the "i'm just as good a member as you" card.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Wayneman
_Emeritus
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:42 pm

Re: Our newest member, Wayneman: Shades' missionary companion??

Post by _Wayneman »

Thank you for the clarification, Gadianton. I stand corrected.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Our newest member, Wayneman: Shades' missionary companion??

Post by _harmony »

Gadianton wrote:So here's the play-by-play.

Harmony (female) says it's good not to use real names here. The context of years of board feuds escapes Wayne -- imagine that -- and Wayne mistakenly thinks she's refering to evil covert operations of a LDS SCMC-like org. While the SCMC is real, evil, and highly connected to apologetics, that wasn't what she was talking about, but rather, the more mundane oaf-like evil of a group of mid-tier to junior apologists -- Internet Mormons who could barely be regarded as Mormon at all and generally lacking the graduate degrees of FARMS -- probably now on MAD (another board) that began posting personal things about Shades publically. So hence, better to be anonymous. So Wayne, sort of on a quick draw, misunderstood Harmony. And then Harmony, instead of corrected Wayne and giving hime a chance to see what she really meant, uses the opportunity to feign an attack on her own member status and pulls the "i'm just as good a member as you" card.


Dang it, Gad! You had to go and ruin all my fun. :twisted:
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Our newest member, Wayneman: Shades' missionary companion??

Post by _bcspace »

Oh, and I'm the one who had a son who served in Nagoya in a slight overlap to your own mission.


My sister served in Nagoya. Would've been about 1991.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
Post Reply