marg wrote:
Were in not for organization fighting to keep church out of schools, to keep science free of religious dogma...the schools would be teacing intelligent design as science and evolution would be disgarded. It's a constant battle.
I think that the history bears this out, by and large. Powerful organisations. religions included, rarely give up their positions of influence voluntarily.
marg wrote:I've never heard of Catholics attending daily mass. They might I don't know, haven't spent much time looking into Catholicism.
Lay Roman Catholics have never been obliged to attend daily mass. They are however obliged to attend mass every Sunday (the day held to be the weekly anniversary of the resurrection of Jesus), and on a few other 'holy days of obligation' during the course of the year.
Amongst both Roman Catholics and other groups of Christians who regard the eucharist as central to belief and practice, it is however common amongst the devout to try to attend the eucharist more often, and sometimes even daily, in the form of a short service which usually takes place early in the morning. But this is completely voluntary, and it is possible to be a 'good Catholic' without doing so.
By contrast, some Christians might have the impression that in the CoJCoLDS "Everything which is not compulsory is forbidden" and vice versa - in the sense (e.g.) that privately organised prayer and study circles are said to be discouraged, but one is supposed to attend a large number of other acitivities during Sunday and at other times in the week.
To what extent is this contrast a real one?