Nightingale wrote:Why is it necessary to bring Mrs. Peterson into any discussion? Not relevant. Not fair. She doesn't post (to my knowledge). That disappoints me. There are so many other relevant points on the table.
You are right, of course. Antishock's comment was low rent.
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei
(I lost access to my Milesius account, so I had to retrieve this one from the mothballs.)
Nightingale wrote:Why is it necessary to bring Mrs. Peterson into any discussion? Not relevant. Not fair. She doesn't post (to my knowledge). That disappoints me. There are so many other relevant points on the table.
Yes, we have the neighborliness of Bill Hamblin to discuss, a deeply relevant issue.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Nightingale wrote:Why is it necessary to bring Mrs. Peterson into any discussion? Not relevant. Not fair. She doesn't post (to my knowledge). That disappoints me. There are so many other relevant points on the table.
I Agree with you on this. I usually like Anti's caustic, acerbic replies. This was idiotic.
The Nehor wrote: Yes, we have the neighborliness of Bill Hamblin to discuss, a deeply relevant issue.
This sounds like a shot. This topic was brought up by DCP. Did you miss that?
Nope, but on a normal message board such a comment would have been ignored.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Chap wrote:I think that what we have here from DCP is an attempt to 'inoculate' readers of this board against references to Hamblin, so when the news eventually breaks (as one day it must) that Hamblin is not only a werewolf, but is also exploiting other werewolves by running a Ponzi style pseudo hedge fund and trafficking innocent American teenage werewolf females to Paraguay for unmentionable purposes, we shall turn away from the evidence with a barely stifled yawn.
I can't speak to whether or not Dr. Hamblin is a good neighbor, but he does definitely have a very bad haircut. There is a film of him floating around---perhaps it is on YouTube; in fact, I think it is on Hamblin's YouTube channel---and it looks if he either cut it himself, using a hedge trimmer, or he paid a visit to the hair stylist of Ken Burns, provided that Burns's stylist was half-blind and suffering from the DTs that day. I don't intend to be mean or anything; most male apologists---indeed, most LDS males---have positively hideous haircuts. But this is beyond bad.
P.s.: you're welcome for my substantive contribution to this thread, DCP.
Good grief, get some sleep and make an attempt to be a better example to the impressionable young adults in your ward. Don't you have anything better to do late at night than to dis the few friends you think you have?
There's no way in hell you would remain a bishop if my kids were in your ward. Someone really needs to refer your SP to your crap on this board.
Mister Scratch wrote:I can't speak to whether or not Dr. Hamblin is a good neighbor, but he does definitely have a very bad haircut.
Oh boy, this is going to be good. . .
There is a film of him floating around---perhaps it is on YouTube; in fact, I think it is on Hamblin's YouTube channel---and it looks if he either cut it himself, using a hedge trimmer, or he paid a visit to the hair stylist of Ken Burns, provided that Burns's stylist was half-blind and suffering from the DTs that day.
LOL!! Do you have a link to Hamblin's YouTube channel so we can see this work of modern art for ourselves?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
