William J. Hamblin: Documentarian

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

William J. Hamblin: Documentarian

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Just as I was considering a re-subscription to Cahiers du Cinema, I found an exciting message in my PM box from one of my favorite anonymous informants. It turns out that Dr. Hamblin, in addition to his talents as a BYU professor of history, is also an amateur filmmaker. One can observe that, in fact, he has more in common with Ken Burns than his hairdo would have initially led one to believe. Further, one can sense a budding rivalry between Bill "Errol Morris" Hamlin and Kerry "Cassavettes" Shirts. They both seem to be making bids for who can be the best practitioner of a genre that might be described as "Mopologetic Kitchen Sink Realism." Or something like that.

In any case, here are the links to two of the films, which were produced and distributed by "Grandpa Productions":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diqEWCgl ... re=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZi1TipZ ... re=channel

The first film is about the "Top Ten Reasons Why BYU is Better than Oxford." The production values leave a lot to be desired, as does Hamblin's regrettably banal narration. Of special note is reason number 8, about science at BYU, and reason number 1. I have to say, I was surprised at Dr. Hamblin's choice. It seems that he thinks that best thing about BYU is "foot baal". Is he referring here to some kind of foot demon, or to some kind of false worship of the foot?

The second film, which lists 20 reasons why Oxford is better than BYU, is considerably better. For one thing, the premise is far more easy to swallow: of course Oxford is better. That's like saying that a film by Steven Spielberg is better than Hamblin's "documentary." Once again, Hamblin's narration is monotonous and yokelish. Frankly, I would rather listen to the sound of eggs being splattered against a brick wall. Dr. H.'s Utah accent sounds the way that I imagine boredom personified would sound.

But, overlooking these clear drawbacks, there is some nice English scenery on display here. A good portion of "pros" in favor of Oxford are eating establishments. At one point, the camera ducks into a pub, where Hamblin appears to be enjoying a platter of authentic fish 'n' chips. But what's that off to the side? Is that a pint of proper English ale? Or is Hamblin all by his lonesome in the pub, working his way through a pint of hearty, peasant orange juice?

Later, Hamblin visits the local bookstore and he expresses amazement at the large number of books for sale (over 100,000!), and he dolefully reports that the shelves amount to 3 miles. All of this seems promising at first, as Hamblin informs us, rather drolly, that there isn't a single "Mormon romance novel." But, this tanks quickly, as it turns out that the whole tour through the bookstore was merely a fun trek on Hamblin's part to see whether or not they had his Temple of Solomon book in stock. (Yes, they do. He gleefully holds it up for the camera to inspect.)

Sadly, much of Hamblin's stabs at humor fall flat. Although Mopologists often boast about their dazzling wit and their penchant for robust and earthy jokes and puns, there is little evidence of that in either of these two cinematic efforts. Much of Hamblin's camerawork is shaky and amateurish, and he relies a bit too heavily on Altman-esque zooms. Still, one can observe a great deal of potential in these two "Grandpa Productions." Certainly, the potential wasn't lost on Hamblin's chief rival:

The Backyard Professor wrote:Woo hoo! You crack me up man. That was fun.


And this one:

The Backyard Professor wrote:THREE MILES?!? (salivating)..... well I dunno about that Solomon's Temple book though that you happened to find..... are you *sure* that guy was qualified to write such an one as that is? It's so darn good, that I hope we don't find out it was some Morman who rote it.


Indeed, Brother Shirts, it was a Morman who rote it, though I don't very much that his finding of the book was any "accident" or "coincidence".

Who knows where Professor Hamblin's foray into the filmic arts will take him? Will his rivalry with Shirts pay off in the form of creative dividends? At the very least, I am sure that we can expect interesting things to come from him in the future.
_Bond James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 2690
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm

Re: William J. Hamblin: Documentarian

Post by _Bond James Bond »

Mister Scratch wrote:I found an exciting message in my PM box...


Rule 3 :exclaim:
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07

MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
_dblagent007
_Emeritus
Posts: 1068
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 6:00 pm

Re: William J. Hamblin: Documentarian

Post by _dblagent007 »

Rule 3 violation!!!! Rule 3 violation!!!!!

This thread must be deleted immediately!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
_Bond James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 2690
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm

Re: William J. Hamblin: Documentarian

Post by _Bond James Bond »

dblagent007 wrote:Rule 3 violation!!!! Rule 3 violation!!!!!

This thread must be deleted immediately!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Or a mod could simply edit the post to remove all mention of PMing. They have the rule with very clear language, they should follow it.
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07

MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: William J. Hamblin: Documentarian

Post by _The Nehor »

B23 wrote:
dblagent007 wrote:Rule 3 violation!!!! Rule 3 violation!!!!!

This thread must be deleted immediately!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Or a mod could simply edit the post to remove all mention of PMing. They have the rule with very clear language, they should follow it.


I don't think that is enough. Banning Scratch is the only solution.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: William J. Hamblin: Documentarian

Post by _moksha »

That last point in the film of BYU not having a Market Square where professors can be burnt at the stake seems to slight BYU way too much. Surely BYU has its own more modern equivalents to rid themselves of heretical professors. Can BYU's ingenuity not be given its due?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: William J. Hamblin: Documentarian

Post by _Dr. Shades »

The following addendum has been added to the first sentence of Universal Rule #3:

". . . that the source him/herself has not overtly made public."

That should cover it.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: William J. Hamblin: Documentarian

Post by _Gadianton »

Fantastic writing, Mister Scratch. I know it will bother professor Peterson for saying this, but it's odd that it would bother him given Gaz's recent heaping praise of him for being "eloquent".

I will have to comment more when I've had the chance to meticulously study these pieces while anxiously pressing my palms together.

One thing I can point out right away though, is that the "kitchen sink realism" here is brethren-approved to a "T". Clearly, when Dr. Peterson speaks about Mormon art maturing, and straining Mormon cultural boundaries, he isn't speaking of the documentary works of Shirts or Hamblin. These exericses in Mormon cinema are little more than catching "banal missionary goofiness" on camera.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: William J. Hamblin: Documentarian

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Mister Scratch wrote:I found an exciting message in my PM box from one of my favorite anonymous informants.

The creepy network of anonymous informants. A signature feature of Scratchism.

Mister Scratch wrote:Mopologists often boast about their dazzling wit and their penchant for robust and earthy jokes and puns

The dishonest straw man set-up. Another recurrent Scratchite technique.

Gadianton wrote:Fantastic writing, Mister Scratch.

The inevitable Scratchite praise-ritual.
_dblagent007
_Emeritus
Posts: 1068
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 6:00 pm

Re: William J. Hamblin: Documentarian

Post by _dblagent007 »

Dr. Shades wrote:The following addendum has been added to the first sentence of Universal Rule #3:

". . . that the source him/herself has not overtly made public."

That should cover it.

Hey, wouldn't that exempt a recently banned poster's last posts? I believe she was the "source" of her posts and she was "overtly" making them public, at least by posting them.
Post Reply