MAD Poster: DCP Delivers Talk that is not "Relevant"

[_The Dude]

they will appreciate the serious tenor of my theory.

What does it mean when a tenor drools out of both sides of his mouth?

The stage is level.

How can you tell when a tenor is really stupid?

When the other tenors notice.

WTF?

[_Gazelam]

Gadianton,

How does DCP agreeing with you justify your foul behavior? This is entirely predictable from him anyway. While he is somewhat cautious about direct insults and so on, he seems to reward those mightily who aren't above such tactics and use them in his service.

The reward you say?

As a matter of fact, in Bro. Peterson's responce you may have noticed the words "admirable gift". That is coded terminoligy meaning that Nehor and I have earned the much coveted ability to now view the "Skinny-L" newsletter.

We are not yet allowed to contribute or exchange emails with the publisher, but we do now get to read it.

Reward indeed.

[_The Nehor]

Gadianton,

How does DCP agreeing with you justify your foul behavior? This is entirely predictable from him anyway. While he is somewhat cautious about direct insults and so on, he seems to reward those mightily who aren't above such tactics and use them in his service.

The reward you say?

As a matter of fact, in Bro. Peterson's responce you may have noticed the words "admirable gift". That is coded terminoligy meaning that Nehor and I have earned the much coveted ability to now view the "Skinny-L" newsletter.

We are not yet allowed to contribute or exchange emails with the publisher, but we do now get to read it.

Reward indeed.

Yep, it's fun to read. You should hear the things they say about you Scratch....especially the banana and car muffler incident. Comic gold.

[_Daniel Peterson]

Oh? Well, then, please enlighten us! No need to keep it a big secret, right?

It's a personal project that I've been tinkering with for a while, and on which I'll continue to work, when I get a few minutes here and there, until I'm ready to publish it.

In the meantime, I don't owe anybody else (let alone you!) an account of it.

Dan. You know perfectly well that I have limited my comments to publicly available skinny-l exchanges

You've generalized from that 0.000001% of Skinny-L traffic to hostile and malevolent characterizations of the list as a whole.

Anyhow: is that not the primary basis of your argument/project---that eyewitness accounts make it "reasonable" to believe in the resurrection? Y/N? (Or, even more likely: you won't say because you're afraid?)

You're a perpetually adversarial loon.

Gadianton has your schtick down to a T.