Calculus Crusader wrote: By way of contrast, while I think Rabbinic Judaism and Trinitarian Christianity are false, I do not believe they are frauds.
What brand of Christianity do you currently subscribe to, CC?
Calculus Crusader wrote: By way of contrast, while I think Rabbinic Judaism and Trinitarian Christianity are false, I do not believe they are frauds.
Calculus Crusader wrote:I view the Old Testament more as backdrop for the New Testament. For me, it is secondary scripture and is to be subordinated to the New Testament. I do not expect the Hebrews/Israelites/Jews to get everything correct before the advent of Jesus Christ.
Calculus Crusader wrote:antishock8 wrote:
Ok. So in West Coast's world, the Mormons, da Joos, and most of Christianity are "demonstrable frauds" unlike his airtight religion, whatever it is he's made up in his head. Phew. And I thought discussing Mormonism was akin to nailing pudding to a wall...
No, blockhead. Fraud implies intentional deceit, which certainly characterizes Holy Joe's religion. By way of contrast, while I think Rabbinic Judaism and Trinitarian Christianity are false, I do not believe they are frauds.
harmony wrote:Calculus Crusader wrote: By way of contrast, while I think Rabbinic Judaism and Trinitarian Christianity are false, I do not believe they are frauds.
What brand of Christianity do you currently subscribe to, CC?
antishock8 wrote:
Jesus Freak. A fraud is a knowing misrepresentation of the truth, or concealment of a material fact to induce another to act to his detriment. Your faith, and I can only assume your church (because you're too much of a coward to let me know what church you attend), fits this description nicely.
antishock8 wrote:Patently absurd fraud. You are a pot calling Mormonism a kettle. These stories, fables, bloody mandates, and chilling doctrines are the most despicable thing I've ever read. Bar none. Bar. None. It's sick. And so are you for believing this tripe. Shame on you, West Coast. Shame on you.
asbestosman wrote:
I wonder what you'd say if I told you I treat the Journal of Discourses (which you love to quote) the way you treat the Old Testament.
I also wonder what you'd say if I told you that I don't accept all psuedo-Joseph Smith stories about polygamy, etc. You'd probably say to me what everyone else has been saying to you on this thread regarding things from the Bible.
Funny that.
P.S. Happy Pi day
(and out of curiosity, what is your mathematical background? I'm a computer/electrical engineer by training and profession, but I read math books for fun).
Calculus Crusader wrote:antishock8 wrote:Patently absurd fraud. You are a pot calling Mormonism a kettle. These stories, fables, bloody mandates, and chilling doctrines are the most despicable thing I've ever read. Bar none. Bar. None. It's sick. And so are you for believing this tripe. Shame on you, West Coast. Shame on you.
They have shots for rabies, you know.
Calculus Crusader wrote:The Journal of Discourses contains the very words of "prophet" Brigham Young and Mormon apostles who were instrumental to the "restoration." It makes no sense for you to view the words of your contemporary "prophets" in the same way as I view the Old Testament, which was old in Jesus' day.
Unfortunately for you, the stories about Smith and Young are corroborated by Mormons as well as their critics. The citation from Jedediah Grant's sermon is a fine example.
I have a bachelor's degree in math and a master's degree in statistics. In addition to probability and statistics classes, I have had classes in ODEs, PDEs, complex variables, and real analysis.