What I've learned from apologetics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

Ray A wrote:And what did KA say about this? To put it mildly, she didn't give a s***.

It's not exactly the first rumour ever started on forums.

No?

Why, I've been accused of being a "Mormon John". :lol:


So it's okay for a poster who may or may not be banned from this forum, since we don't really know who made that post, to accuse KA of something really heinous, on a board KA cannot post on?

Good to know how your mind works, Ray. Thanks. Remind me to never expect you to stand for something.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Jersey Girl »

harmony wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:Why should someone's mother be expected to post here?


Hell if I know. marg seems to think the original poster was someone's mother.


What if her mother did write those posts? Why should her mother come to MDB to defend her?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Ray A

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Ray A »

harmony wrote:
No, you don't get it, Ray. M, whoever M is, posted a very heinous accusation against KA, in a place where KA could not respond. The can of worms was not opened by me, nor was it opened by KA; it was opened by M, whoever M is.

We have no proof of who M is. Why do you assume it is the poster who was banned from here? Why do you assume the M from MAD cannot post here?

And I want to know why you aren't defending KA on MAD. You can post there. She can't; neither can I. Why are you not defending her? Why are you not calling M, whoever M is, to account?


Okay, I'll be very honest here (for a change? excuse my weird humour), I haven't followed that thread on MAD very closely, and my understanding is that no one is making a big deal of it. And from what I've read it seems to have been cleared up.

If KA is still being besmirched there, then I will say something.

You tell me what you think needs to be said.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

marg wrote:No Harmony you need to get a clue..seriously. You are making assumptions without sufficient facts. M asked for that post to be removed. Her post was removed but just like what happens here, it remained as a quote in 2 other people's posts, which you took upon herself to copy over here, along with attacking M in the process. And when all this discussion is said and done, hopefully the next time you'll reconsider making assumptions..and perhaps some of these posts will be deleted.


Back to the top again.

marg... you don't know who Mangoes is! Try to remember that. Let me say it again: YOU DON'T KNOW WHO MANGOES IS! Did you get it that time? You don't know if Mangoes is banned from here or not, because you don't know who Mangoes is!

Talk about assumptions!

I'm going with what is real... like someone accused KA of something she didn't do? Like... someone who lied about KA? Like that someone is who posted under the nickname of Mangoes? Right. Who is Mangoes, marg? Oh yeah... you don't know... you just assume!

God Almighty, but you make me laugh, woman!
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

Jersey Girl wrote:Hell if I know. marg seems to think the original poster was someone's mother.


What if her mother did write those posts? Why should her mother come to MDB to defend her?[/quote]

Hell if I know. We don't even know who Mangoes is.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Jersey Girl »

harmony wrote:
marg wrote:No Harmony you need to get a clue..seriously. You are making assumptions without sufficient facts. M asked for that post to be removed. Her post was removed but just like what happens here, it remained as a quote in 2 other people's posts, which you took upon herself to copy over here, along with attacking M in the process. And when all this discussion is said and done, hopefully the next time you'll reconsider making assumptions..and perhaps some of these posts will be deleted.


Back to the top again.

marg... you don't know who Mangoes is! Try to remember that. Let me say it again: YOU DON'T KNOW WHO MANGOES IS! Did you get it that time? You don't know if Mangoes is banned from here or not, because you don't know who Mangoes is!

Talk about assumptions!

I'm going with what is real... like someone accused KA of something she didn't do? Like... someone who lied about KA? Like that someone is who posted under the nickname of Mangoes? Right. Who is Mangoes, marg? Oh yeah... you don't know... you just assume!

God Almighty, but you make me laugh, woman!


harm...the reference was to the cupcake queen. No one mentioned KA specifically.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Ray A

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Ray A »

Jersey Girl wrote:
harm...the reference was to the cupcake queen. No one mentioned KA specifically.


And I think that's where the confusion arose.
_marg

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _marg »

harmony wrote:

marg... you don't know who Mangoes is! Try to remember that. Let me say it again: YOU DON'T KNOW WHO MANGOES IS! Did you get it that time? You don't know if Mangoes is banned from here or not, because you don't know who Mangoes is!

Talk about assumptions!


Mangoes is M harmony. However whoever wrote that post which you brought here was not necessarily M. And M said she didn't write it and didn't like it. She removed it. I can think of several scenarios in which someone else could have used her account. It's quite possible Harm to use a computer for a message board and have it so that it logs in automatically the next time someone logs onto the message board.

I'm going with what is real... like someone accused KA of something she didn't do? Like... someone who lied about KA? Like that someone is who posted under the nickname of Mangoes? Right. Who is Mangoes, marg? Oh yeah... you don't know... you just assume!
God Almighty, but you make me laugh, woman!


Once again, you made an assumption M was guilty, a liar, seeking drama and decided to crap on her on this board. She's unable to respond here. It certainly would be drama for her to respond to you on the other board.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

Ray A wrote:Okay, I'll be very honest here (for a change? excuse my weird humour), I haven't followed that thread on MAD very closely, and my understanding is that no one is making a big deal of it. And from what I've read it seems to have been cleared up.

If KA is still being besmirched there, then I will say something.

You tell me what you think needs to be said.


Still? How many times does she have to be accused of terrible things, in order for someone to say something?

Of course no one is making a big deal of it on MAD. What does MAD care about KA? What do MAD posters care when someone who cannot post over there is maligned over there, about something really heinous? When was the last time MAD posters cared about what was true?

Tell them that you don't think it's right for someone to make accusations in a place where they cannot defend themselves. Watch yourself get censored by the mods.

I know why you don't say anything. If you do, you'll get banned too. Big deal... it's like you said... it's just KA, it's just a rumor, it's nothing.

What I want to know is, why was it a big deal, when you thought it was our only banned poster that was involved? Before I pointed out that we don't know who Mangoes is... before I pointed out that for all we know, Mangoes can post here.

You assumed too, Ray. Just like marg.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

Ray A wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
harm...the reference was to the cupcake queen. No one mentioned KA specifically.


And I think that's where the confusion arose.


What confusion? What other Cupcake Queen is there here, on MDB?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply