What I've learned from apologetics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

Ray A wrote:
harmony wrote:I don't know who Mangoes is, marg. (neither do you)


You're not serious, are you?


I'm not assuming, Ray. Why are you?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

Jersey Girl wrote:Why can't her mother go there and defend her?


Ask marg. She's the expert on mothers of assumed posters. Or maybe it's daughters now, since she seems to think the computer was somehow left unattended. Or maybe dads? Or husbands? Ask marg. She's the assumption queen.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Ray A

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Ray A »

harmony wrote:I'm not rehashing that, Ray. We have no proof that our only banned poster is in any way connected with this latest bit of drama. What we have is a poster by name of Mangoes who accused our own Cupcake Queen of some pretty nasty stuff. And you didn't defend the Cupcake Queen, did you? That's right. You didn't. When she couldn't, you didn't.


Point me to the thread, and the accusations on MAD (I'm lazy). I did go through it before, and no one made a big deal of it.

So please point me to this continung drama, where KA is made out to be the devil.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Jersey Girl »

What lie was posted about KA?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

Jersey Girl wrote:What lie was posted about KA?


You'll have to go to MAD to see it, Jersey. Liz deleted it off this thread, remember?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Jersey Girl »

harmony wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:Why can't her mother go there and defend her?


Ask marg. She's the expert on mothers of assumed posters. Or maybe it's daughters now, since she seems to think the computer was somehow left unattended. Or maybe dads? Or husbands? Ask marg. She's the assumption queen.


No, I think you misunderstand what I'm asking, harm.

Why can't KA's mother go defend her on MAD?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Jersey Girl »

harmony wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:What lie was posted about KA?


You'll have to go to MAD to see it, Jersey. Liz deleted it off this thread, remember?


I've read it more times than I care to admit. I don't see any lie posted about KA.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_marg

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _marg »

harmony wrote:

You don't know that Mangoes is our only banned poster, marg. You ASSUME it is, but you don't know that. You would LIKE it to be. You'd just LOVE it to be. But you don't KNOW that. And you can't prove it.


I wouldn't know about Mangoes on the other board had it not been for you bringing the post Mangoes had wanted deleted.. over to here. It's obvious who Mangoes is when one reads that post who brought here and the one in which she explains she didn't write it. However it is not obvious that Mangoes/M wrote the post referring to the cupcake queen. In fact it doesn't sound like it was her. It sounds like someone speaking on behalf of her, someone close, someone who is upset for a number of reasons. And there is no indication the person knows this board exists.

Sheesh Harmony all you had to do was admit you are wrong, or delete your stuff. At least Liz had the good sense to delete your stuff when you wouldn't.

Once again, you made an assumption M was guilty, a liar, seeking drama and decided to s*** on her on this board. She's unable to respond here. It certainly would be drama for her to respond to you on the other board.


I don't know who Mangoes is, marg. (neither do you) I do know who the Cupcake Queen of MDB is, though. It's KA. I wonder why you aren't at all concerned about KA. Why is that?


You know Harmony ...you are being extremely disingenuous. One reason I'm not concerned about K.A. is because she's expressed she's not concerned. K.A. can post here and speak for herself. And the person who wrote the post on MAD express some very unsettling information if true.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

Ray A wrote:Point me to the thread, and the accusations on MAD (I'm lazy). I did go through it before, and no one made a big deal of it.

So please point me to this continung drama, where KA is made out to be the devil.


There is no drama about it on MAD, Ray. They don't care about our Cupcake Queen there. For all I know, it's on page 3 now.

The reference was deleted here, at the request of some of our posters,who also don't seem to care diddly about our Cupcake Queen. But they were so busy defending someone named Mangoes, who we don't know from Adam. Or Cain, as the case may be.

Trigger happy. Some of us are just trigger happy.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Jersey Girl »

harmony wrote:
Ray A wrote:Point me to the thread, and the accusations on MAD (I'm lazy). I did go through it before, and no one made a big deal of it.

So please point me to this continung drama, where KA is made out to be the devil.


There is no drama about it on MAD, Ray. They don't care about our Cupcake Queen there. For all I know, it's on page 3 now.

The reference was deleted here, at the request of some of our posters,who also don't seem to care diddly about our Cupcake Queen. But they were so busy defending someone named Mangoes, who we don't know from Adam. Or Cain, as the case may be.

Trigger happy. Some of us are just trigger happy.


I want to know, harm, why you are placing more emphasis on KA than on the mental state of the poster who was described in the posts that you transferred?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply