Chap wrote:Uh-huh. Great little religion you have there, bishop!
His participation here is free. He's at liberty to leave if he doesn't like the heat.
Chap wrote:Uh-huh. Great little religion you have there, bishop!
Dr. Shades wrote:I think it depends, but before we can continue, it would help if we knew:
Church member or not, is he still an employee/director/whatever of the Mormon Gulag?
Daniel Peterson wrote:Could you please supply an example of the personal information about Mike Quinn that I've supposedly made public?
Jersey Girl wrote:
You have no proof
Jersey Girl wrote:And even if you did, I don't see how smearing the guy's character will help your cause.
Daniel Peterson wrote:[Potentially slanderous/libelous material deleted]
GoodK wrote:The "sad incident" you learned of via Paul Hanks?
Daniel Peterson wrote:His participation here is free. He's at liberty to leave if he doesn't like the heat.
GoodK wrote:When I worked in finance, our legal/compliance department would send out monthly "ethics scenarios" via email posing hypothetical situations dealing with kickbacks, conflicts of interest, etc.
Since I have a real life ethics scenario troubling me at the moment, I thought I would seek the advice of this distinguished group. Before reading, I want you to know I am being 100% sincere. Continue.
I have been made aware of a rather embarrassing bit of personal information about a Mormon Gulag executive. First, a little
Background:
This person is a very tenured and high ranking staff member, and is also involved in one of the gulag's other sister program.
This person appeared on my "The Bad Ones" list long before I found this out.
The Scenario:
Let's just call this Gulag executive "Roy." Roy, his wife, and his children lived in Utah County were he was a bishop in his ward.
One day a woman came to his office, seeking the advice of her bishop for her marital problems. An affair transpired, they were caught, and Roy was excommunicated. His wife divorced him, and Roy has since remarried to his mistress. I received information a month ago from my best informant, another staff member, about Roy's excommunication. I then received the same information from another independent source that currently works with Roy.
--Considering that;
A. This is not a good person who has been abusive and cruel to children,
B. Apologists - like DCP and Bob Crockett, for example - take an active role in bringing to light the personal lives/skeletons of critics of the church (like Quinn),
C. This speaks to "Roy's" character and subsequently the leadership of the Mormon Gulag and its affiliates
Would you share this information publicly?
..
Daniel Peterson wrote:I refuse to make this thread about GoodK's [Potentially slanderous/libelous material deleted], so I will remain silent on the matter.
DCP wrote:I know nothing about that but what was publicly available. And you know it, too.
Daniel Peterson wrote:Don't try to use me as a human shield for what you want to do.
GoodK wrote:
Considering that;
A. This is not a good person who has been abusive and cruel to children,
B. Apologists - like DCP and Bob Crockett, for example - take an active role in bringing to light the personal lives/skeletons of critics of the church (like Quinn),
C. This speaks to "Roy's" character and subsequently the leadership of the Mormon Gulag and its affiliates
Would you share this information publicly?
..
Daniel Peterson wrote:I guess I've sat on what I know long enough: [Potentially slanderous/libelous material deleted]