Peterson Pace - "Those who can, do ....."

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Peterson Pace - "Those who can, do ....."

Post by _harmony »

Daniel Peterson wrote:It demonstrates that Taliban-style Islam is hostile to the education of women, [snip blah blah blah...]


We agree! Good grief, I've now agreed with marg and Daniel in the same half hour! Armageddon surely cannot be far behind! :eek:

And this isn't merely a matter of "brand name." You can't generalize simple-mindedly [snip blah blah blah] and [snip blah blah blah again] with reckless abandon from Islam as interpreted by the Taliban to Islam everywhere.


I didn't. That's what you did. My point was that Islam, Taliban brand Islam, is at the root of the problems of Afghan women. Without Islam, Taliban style, which is still Islam at least according to even the most progressive Muslims and until further notice, Afghan women have as good a shot at an education as any other woman in the world who lives under similiar circumstances. It's the Taliban Islam that keeps them at 87% illiteracy rates.

I rest my case. I have other things to do. I need to get ready for an Easter egg hunt!
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Peterson Pace - "Those who can, do ....."

Post by _The Nehor »

Woah.....

Did Harmony just agree with Daniel over the stuff she was screaming at him about a few pages back?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Peterson Pace - "Those who can, do ....."

Post by _harmony »

The Nehor wrote:Woah.....

Did Harmony just agree with Daniel over the stuff she was screaming at him about a few pages back?


Did you not notice him screaming at me? Nevermind. Of course you didn't. That would be ... earthshaking...
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_antishock8
_Emeritus
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am

Re: Peterson Pace - "Those who can, do ....."

Post by _antishock8 »

I find it more than interesting to observe men arguin on behalf of a system that mandates a woman subordinate in her dress and manners. I have to ask, would these men be so keen on adopting these dress and behavioral codes for themselves if someone else told them God decreed it?

Also, reference our resident Communist... You are more than welcome to “F” off and live in a Communist country. Be my guest. As for me, I like our economic system... It gave us the Internet Pr0nz and the Super Bowl. I win.
You can’t trust adults to tell you the truth.

Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Peterson Pace - "Those who can, do ....."

Post by _The Nehor »

harmony wrote:
The Nehor wrote:Woah.....

Did Harmony just agree with Daniel over the stuff she was screaming at him about a few pages back?


Did you not notice him screaming at me? Nevermind. Of course you didn't. That would be ... earthshaking...


No, I saw him get annoyed and ask for your justification for attacking him. He seemed angry but he remained rational.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Peterson Pace - "Those who can, do ....."

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

harmony wrote:I am, after all, only harmony... and expendable.

Come on. The faux self-pity, the drama queen victimhood-pose, is transparently inappropriate after the way you've behaved on this thread.

marg wrote:Did you see this exchange in the Celestial, Harmony?

marg is referring to this:

Muslim women

marg wrote:Ajax mentions that it looks like women wearing full covering garb are happy, T.D. responds with a counter and specifically mentions wearing a hijab, so the 2 of them are talking about a ful body face covering outfit. DCP's added comment is that he knows women who willingly and happily choose traditional Islamic garb. Since the context of the discussion is a burka it is reasonable to assume that is what he's referring to, if not he certainly should have made it clear.

The context is absolutely not a discussion of the burka.

Re-read the exchange.

I've made it clear in numerous venues for many years that I find the burka an abomination. Don't equate the hijab -- or, more precisely, the khimar -- with the burka. They're quite distinct.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab

marg wrote:Where is his empathy for women in this situation? He appears to have none.

I repeat: Even if it could be demonstrated that I have absolutely no empathy for women, and that I require my own wife to wear a burka, that would be irrelevant to the question -- which is and has been the focus of this discussion -- whether or not Islam, as such, punishes the education of women. Insulting me, seeking to portray me as a monster, won't erase the statements on this subject from Muhammad, won't wipe away the statistics I've cited, won't make Tarski's three graduate students or my khimar-wearing editorial assistant go away, won't turn the Taliban into mainstream Muslims, and won't overturn the principles of basic logic.

marg wrote:ajax18 wrote: "In my experience, Islamic women in their full covering and dress don't strike me as depressed or abused. They seem proud of their religious convictions and walk with their heads held high. I think they're happy because they believe in the promises offered them in the next life as well. I don't think this attitude is the result of being beaten down and conditioned to believe they have less potential for happiness than men do. They must see their own good in it somewhere."

T.D: "There is a big difference between women wearing a hijab by choice and women who can't be seen in public without a man, who have to walk behind men, and who are invisible in society, and beaten by their husbands with the blessings of Allah. [emphasis added by DCP]

Have you ever actually spoken to women who live this way?

Would YOU like living this way? (Not being able to leave your home without a full black cover where you peek out of the black netting of your mask)? Where you have virtually no rights? Where you can't drive a car? Have to walk behind women and girls as an inferior being?"

DCP: "I've met plenty of such Muslim women myself. [DCP: Marg omits my quotation of ajax's comment here, which makes absolutely plain that I'm referring to his post, and not to TD's. That omission serves her design of demonizing me, which is why Harmony has received it with glee and satisfaction.]

There are, obviously, many oppressed women in the Islamic world. But there are many who willingly and happily choose for themselves to adopt traditional Islamic garb. I know several of them, and I know some of them reasonably well."
Last edited by Guest on Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_marg

Re: Peterson Pace - "Those who can, do ....."

Post by _marg »

I have a few questions for you Harmony. If you think Islam is a significant reason for illiteracy of women. And you mentioned that women from Turkey who are educated isn't surprising to you. I'll add that Turkey is a democracy and has separation of state and religion. What do you see as the causal difference between Mormonism and Islam in women's literacy? What do you see as significant factors which differentiate Islam from Mormonism and how women are viewed?

Where I'm coming from is that my impression is that Islam and Mormonism are very similar and were it not for separation of state and religion, and if we lived in countries headed by Mormon men, that women would be illiterate, living in polygynous marriages. At least under Islam men are supposed to only take up to 4 wives, that's better than Mormon leaders promoted and still practice under the truer version of J. Smith's religion.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Peterson Pace - "Those who can, do ....."

Post by _harmony »

Fix your quote, Daniel. I didn't have any part of that discussion.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Peterson Pace - "Those who can, do ....."

Post by _The Nehor »

marg wrote:Where I'm coming from is that my impression is that Islam and Mormonism are very similar and were it not for separation of state and religion, and if we lived in countries headed by Mormon men, that women would be illiterate, living in polygynous marriages. At least under Islam men are supposed to only take up to 4 wives, that's better than Mormon leaders promoted and still practice under the truer version of J. Smith's religion.


Yes, with those monsters like Brigham Young (who said given the choice between educating his sons or his daughters he would choose his daughters) running the show Utah would have become an illiterate female culture if it weren't for the U.S. :rolleyes:
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Peterson Pace - "Those who can, do ....."

Post by _harmony »

marg wrote:I have a few questions for you Harmony. If you think Islam is a significant reason for illiteracy of women. And you mentioned that women from Turkey who are educated isn't surprising to you. I'll add that Turkey is a democracy and has separation of state and religion. What do you see as the causal difference between Mormonism and Islam in women's literacy? What do you see as significant factors which differentiate Islam from Mormonism and how women are viewed?

Where I'm coming from is that my impression is that Islam and Mormonism are very similar and were it not for separation of state and religion, and if we lived in countries headed by Mormon men, that women would be illiterate, living in polygynous marriages. At least under Islam men are supposed to only take up to 4 wives, that's better than Mormon leaders promoted and still practice under the truer version of J. Smith's religion.


I think your question would be more appropriately directed towards any number of priesthood holders here, marg. My views on polygamy are well known. I don't know enough about Muslims to compare them to Mormons, except for the most superficial comparisons.

I wonder if Evangelical Christians view Mormons like what Daniel refers to as Mainstream Muslims view the Taliban. It would be an interesting read, if there was a study or book about it.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply