Ethics Scenario

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Locked
_GoodK

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _GoodK »

Daniel Peterson wrote:I do.



Enjoy it, we'll be seeing each other soon.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Incidentally, for any on-lookers:

GoodK's threat is a potentially very serious one. He could, in theory, bankrupt me and, in a sense, destroy my life, as well as that of my wife and children. Anybody can sue anybody over anything, whether or not the suit has merit, especially if the right kind of lawyer can be found, and, even if the suit is ultimately a failure, the sheer cost of defending against it can be ruinous.

I genuinely wonder if this seems a reasonable or desirable outcome to anybody else here, in this particular case. I'm sincerely curious, and would appreciate input. Even from some of my more hostile enemies here. Please do weigh in.

P.S. Just noticed antishock8's opinion, which I appreciate.
_GoodK

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _GoodK »

antishock8 wrote:Hey, GoodK. Anytime anyone hurts your feelings you should sue them. Sue them reeeeal good. In fact, everyone should sue everyone reeeeal good.

You're an idiot. Welcome to America.


I'm desperately trying to justify responding to your last few posts directed at me, but I just can't do it. Sorry.

I'm not here to continue the colossal waste of time that this thread has become, only to serve DCP with proper "notice" and to let the board know that I don't take libel lightly.

Take care, and I look forward to Ray's upcoming posts in his new role. I will gladly help in anyway I can.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _Jersey Girl »

GoodK wrote:I have great news!

I heard back from the attorney I contacted last week regarding Daniel C. Peterson's nasty, libelous comments made on this website about me. The lawyer has expressed interest in pursuing my defamation claim, and I will post any and all updates in this thread.

I also want to make sure DCP knows that should he chose to continue antagonizing me with spurious slanderous nonsense, he will find his cell phone number, home address, home phone number and all the other personal information I have obtained from my step-dad posted on the Mormon Gulag message board.
Why there?
Well, to be frank, I have a much more loyal following there. Sure, I consider many participants here friends but the crowd at the Mormon Gulag website are much more inclined to say, oh I don't know, go pay Mr. Peterson a visit should it come to that.

DCP wanted a war, here it is.


So it begins.


See the part that I bolded, Goodk? That's you screwing yourself and supporters of your efforts in full public view.

That's about the stupidest thing you could have posted. You have no street smarts. No street smarts at all.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _Jersey Girl »

GoodK wrote:
antishock8 wrote:Hey, GoodK. Anytime anyone hurts your feelings you should sue them. Sue them reeeeal good. In fact, everyone should sue everyone reeeeal good.

You're an idiot. Welcome to America.


I'm desperately trying to justify responding to your last few posts directed at me, but I just can't do it. Sorry.

I'm not here to continue the colossal waste of time that this thread has become, only to serve DCP with proper "notice" and to let the board know that I don't take libel lightly.

Take care, and I look forward to Ray's upcoming posts in his new role. I will gladly help in anyway I can.


Serve DCP with proper "notice" and to let the board know that you don't take libel lightly? Uh, did ya happen to "notice" that you wrapped up your "notice" with a freakin' threat?

I can't believe how stupid that was, GoodK.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_GoodK

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _GoodK »

Daniel Peterson wrote:Incidentally, for any on-lookers:

GoodK's threat is a potentially very serious one. He could, in theory, bankrupt me and, in a sense, destroy my life, as well as that of my wife and children.



I very much hope for this outcome.

To Jersey Girl,

Have you noticed that I have been ignoring your commentary on this?
Maybe you haven't, so I'll tell you straight that I have been. Why?

Your opinions are so far off, and so inconsequential in my opinion, they deserve less of a response than this here. You're judgement is clearly impaired by this.

I'll reiterate my announcement, just for you:

I have great news!

I heard back from the attorney I contacted last week regarding Daniel C. Peterson's nasty, libelous comments made on this website about me. The lawyer has expressed interest in pursuing my defamation claim, and I will post any and all updates in this thread.

I also want to make sure DCP knows that should he chose to continue antagonizing me with spurious slanderous nonsense, he will find his cell phone number, home address, home phone number and all the other personal information I have obtained from my step-dad posted on the Mormon Gulag message board.
Why there?
Well, to be frank, I have a much more loyal following there. Sure, I consider many participants here friends but the crowd at the Mormon Gulag website are much more inclined to say, oh I don't know, go pay Mr. Peterson a visit should it come to that.

DCP wanted a war, here it is.

So it begins.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

GoodK wrote:
Daniel Peterson wrote:Incidentally, for any on-lookers:

GoodK's threat is a potentially very serious one. He could, in theory, bankrupt me and, in a sense, destroy my life, as well as that of my wife and children.

I very much hope for this outcome.

I think that's important to know, and I believe it should be emphasized. Hence my emphasis.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _Jersey Girl »

GoodK,

I don't give a rock solid damn what you ignore. Don't expect ME to sit on my hands while you make a total ass of yourself. You couldn't have done anything more foolish than that. This is what happens when you let arrogance, instead of a functioning brain, do your thinking for you. How stupid could you possibly get? Seriously.

Don't care for my remarks? Let your attorney have a gander at that post and see what the advice is.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_GoodK

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _GoodK »

Daniel Peterson wrote:I think that's important to know, and I believe it should be emphasized. Hence my emphasis.


I think it is important to know that there are some people you shouldn't test.

When we're through you'll be feeling nostalgic for Mister Scratch.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _The Nehor »

Wow, you finally get an attorney and do you target the organization you're SUPPOSEDLY crusading against? Nope. You target a message board poster.

You're an idiot.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Locked