Ethics Scenario
Re: Ethics Scenario
Hey GoodK. Why Dr. Peterson? I thought you were coming after me? I feel left out.
Your attorney must be a complete moron. Where's he from? Utah? Tell me his name. I'll fill him in on what I really know about you.
Your attorney must be a complete moron. Where's he from? Utah? Tell me his name. I'll fill him in on what I really know about you.
Last edited by _rcrocket on Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 6215
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm
Re: Ethics Scenario
This is perhaps where I can tell anyone who cares (not GoodK in this case) that I while believe it's important to work within the law, I think we need tort reform, badly. People sue too much.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
Re: Ethics Scenario
Jersey Girl wrote:GoodK,
I don't give a rock solid damn what you ignore.
Well, as long as you know. I really, really don't respect your opinion in this situation (no offense, you know I like you otherwise).
DCP has grown comfortable with attacking unresponsive "critics."
The time has come for him to be removed from this comfort zone, for the sake of all of us.
How stupid could you possibly get? Seriously.
We will see.
Don't care for my remarks? Let your attorney have a gander at that post and see what the advice is.
There was nothing illegal in my post, as opposed to Professor Peterson's.
That is all.
Like I told Ken Allen, at this point Daniel Peterson will have to bury me if he wants it to stop.
.
Re: Ethics Scenario
asbestosman wrote:This is perhaps where I can tell anyone who cares (not GoodK in this case) that I while believe it's important to work within the law, I think we need tort reform, badly. People sue too much.
We don't need tort reform for this. Any suit GoodK would bring under the circumstances of this Board would expose him and his lawyer to sanctions. In California, they would be anti-SLAPP sanctions and fees. I don't know what they are in Utah, but they could be Rule 11 filing sanctions. And then there is the mandatory deposition of Mr. Goodk where he gets to explain his past doings.
Re: Ethics Scenario
The Nehor wrote:You're an idiot.
Wow, The Nehor. I have such a high respect for your intellect, this insult really, really cuts deep into my core.
I'll have to take a step back and reflect over this.
(For the record, the attorney pursuing the class action lawsuit against the Mormon Gulag is not the same person I referred to in my post.)
Re: Ethics Scenario
GoodK wrote:The Nehor wrote:You're an idiot.
Wow, The Nehor. I have such a high respect for your intellect, this insult really, really cuts deep into my core.
I'll have to take a step back and reflect over this.
(For the record, the attorney pursuing the class action lawsuit against the Mormon Gulag is not the same person I referred to in my post.)
OK, I'll bite; who are your attorneys in both cases? Everybody knows your name. They know your claims. It is easy to claim you have an attorney.
There's no purpose in keeping the identities of your attorneys secret. Tell us so that we can measure the verity of your threats.
Last edited by _rcrocket on Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11832
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am
Re: Ethics Scenario
GoodK wrote:Incidentally, for any on-lookers:
I also want to make sure DCP knows that should he chose to continue antagonizing me with spurious slanderous nonsense, he will find his cell phone number, home address, home phone number and all the other personal information I have obtained from my step-dad posted on the Mormon Gulag message board.
Why there?
Well, to be frank, I have a much more loyal following there. Sure, I consider many participants here friends but the crowd at the Mormon Gulag website are much more inclined to say, oh I don't know, go pay Mr. Peterson a visit should it come to that.
So, not only do you CLAIM to have a lawyer and that you're considering a lawsuit. You now publicly make threats against the person and property of the person you're suing....classy and in no way legally stupid. Goodk begins the opening salve of the war by firing an artillery barrage on his own side.
Seriously though I doubt Goodk has a lawyer and if he has talked to one on the phone I doubt the lawyer will consider the case once he sees the flood of evidence......soldier on ya lunatic.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Re: Ethics Scenario
rcrocket wrote:Hey GoodK. Why Dr. Peterson? I thought you were coming after me? I feel left out.
Your attorney must be a complete moron. Where's he from? Utah? Tell me his name. I'll fill him in on what I really know about you.
Wow. The cowardice continues.
All,
I have been literally begging Bob "short stack" Crockett to contact me for several days. I have given him my number and implored him to stop being an anonymous coward.
deleted by harmony. Do not post about PMs.
To any onlookers, I have never met Bob Crockett. The only connection me and Mr. Napoleon have is through his lovely daughter, [name deleted], who I haven't seen in many, many years.
Sponge Bob knows zero about me or my family, besides my step-dad (who knows less about me than several posters on this board).
Libel is something I take seriously, but even more so, I take the personal disrespect from both of these Christians as a slap in the face.
I don't care how ugly it gets. It has officially begun.
Bob,
I suggest you call me, or cease and desist before you too find your personal information posted on the Mormon Gulag message board.
You know as well as I do what details are listed in the Valencia Stake directory.
Re: Ethics Scenario
The Nehor wrote: You now publicly make threats against the person and property of the person you're suing....classy and in no way legally stupid.
The Nehor, as this is my last response to a stupid person's post I hope this holds you over.
I never made any threats to Mr. Peterson's person or property.
Perhaps you should reread the posts?
And besides, posting personal information is not a legitimate defense to a libel claim.
In a way, it would be poetic justice for me to do so, given the timeline of events surrounding me and the LDS bishop.
Last edited by _GoodK on Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ethics Scenario
GoodK wrote:
Wow. The cowardice continues.
All,
I have been literally begging Bob "short stack" Crockett to contact me for several days. I have given him my number and implored him to stop being an anonymous coward.
deleted by harmony. Do not post about PMs.
To any onlookers, I have never met Bob Crockett. The only connection me and Mr. Napoleon have is through his lovely daughter, [name deleted], who I haven't seen in many, many years.
Sponge Bob knows zero about me or my family, besides my step-dad (who knows less about me than several posters on this board).
Libel is something I take seriously, but even more so, I take the personal disrespect from both of these Christians as a slap in the face.
I don't care how ugly it gets. It has officially begun.
Bob,
I suggest you call me, or cease and desist before you too find your personal information posted on the Mormon Gulag message board.
You know as well as I do what details are listed in the Valencia Stake directory.
Now you're posting the contents of PMs? Sorry -- the best way to respond to an extortioner is to keep asking for proof.
Waiting -- waiting -- waiting for the name of your attorneys. We'll see about your stories.