Ethics Scenario

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Locked
_rcrocket

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _rcrocket »

GoodK wrote:
rcrocket wrote:It is all fun. It is all games. Nothing more than that.


When did I ever say this? [Not that there is anything wrong with it.]
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _harmony »

GoodK wrote:
harmony wrote:Do not post anything from PMs or chat.



Go f*** yourself harmony, and don't tell me what to do.


Take it up with Shades. Until then, follow Rule #3.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_rcrocket

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _rcrocket »

GoodK wrote:What would you do?


Man up. Quit sending extortive private messages. Quit threatening to expose people's personal lives if they don't stop talking trash.

Use the King's English better. Oops. That one was over the line, wasn't it?
Go f*** yourself harmony, and don't tell me what to do.


Yeah, Harmony, you're not the boss of him.
_GoodK

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _GoodK »

Man up.



I tried that already, however you are an anonymous coward (ironically).

This is what you said, remember:

rcrocket wrote:It is all fun. It is all games. Nothing more than that.


Quit sending extortive private messages.

I've never sent an extortive private message. You, on the other hand, have sent numerous messages that can only be described as "bizarre."

I can't go into the details, but let's just say that rcrocket has a very disgusting, off color sense of humor.


Quit threatening to expose people's personal lives if they don't stop talking trash.


LOL
_rcrocket

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _rcrocket »

GoodK wrote:
rcrocket wrote:It is all fun. It is all games. Nothing more than that.


I have never said this in this forum.

I can't go into the details, but let's just say that rcrocket has a very disgusting, off color sense of humor.


That's libelous. (Big deal, libel away.) But, it is untrue.
_karl61
_Emeritus
Posts: 2983
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:29 pm

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _karl61 »

rcrocket wrote:
karl61 wrote:[

I don't know anything about Adult Protective Services. And you defending private schools. It sounds like something you would be involved in - Did the teacher punch the student? The only way CPS would be involved would be to interview the teachers children to make sure they were not being hit like the student. Also to speak with the student and the students parents about failing to protect against crazy teachers.


No. Sex abuse cases. I also represent other institutions is childhood sex abuse cases; in every case DPSS and the cops have been involved. I see how it works.


of course they would be involved - but they didn't transfer you to a police officer. They likely took the referral and sent a social worker to the scene. If it was founded then the social worker contact the police where the crime took place. Sometimes the police and social worker go to the school together; sometimes it's the social worker first and sometimes its the police first. But I believe you wrote in your post that during the phone call to the hotline they transfered you to the police - wrong! and then go out when ever they got the time - wrong!
I want to fly!
_rcrocket

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _rcrocket »

karl61 wrote:of course they would be involved - but they didn't transfer you to a police officer. They likely took the referral and sent a social worker to the scene. If it was founded then the social worker contact the police where the crime took place. Sometimes the police and social worker go to the school together; sometimes it's the social worker first and sometimes its the police first. But I believe you wrote in your post that during the phone call to the hotline they transfered you to the police - wrong! and then go out when ever they got the time - wrong!


Transferred me directly to the police after giving me their DPSS case number. There's a little law in California requiring reporting to law enforcement personnel within 36 hours. Your internet scholarship doesn't cut it with a professional who works in the area.

You're quite the defender of GoodK and his story aren't you, even though he refuses to say whether he ever made the report in Utah. (I really don't know Utah procedure, I must admit.) You are in good company.
_karl61
_Emeritus
Posts: 2983
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:29 pm

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _karl61 »

rcrocket wrote:
karl61 wrote:of course they would be involved - but they didn't transfer you to a police officer. They likely took the referral and sent a social worker to the scene. If it was founded then the social worker contact the police where the crime took place. Sometimes the police and social worker go to the school together; sometimes it's the social worker first and sometimes its the police first. But I believe you wrote in your post that during the phone call to the hotline they transfered you to the police - wrong! and then go out when ever they got the time - wrong!


Transferred me directly to the police after giving me their DPSS case number.


it's not a case number its a referral number. A case number is something different and a court case number is something different to. You are a Bishop and likely make referrals on your ward. You likely also read the notes the social workers made when they interviewed the victim and maybe also the teachers children. But only with a court order. Have you represented families in Dependency Court?
Last edited by Guest on Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
I want to fly!
_karl61
_Emeritus
Posts: 2983
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:29 pm

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _karl61 »

rcrocket wrote:
karl61 wrote:of course they would be involved - but they didn't transfer you to a police officer. They likely took the referral and sent a social worker to the scene. If it was founded then the social worker contact the police where the crime took place. Sometimes the police and social worker go to the school together; sometimes it's the social worker first and sometimes its the police first. But I believe you wrote in your post that during the phone call to the hotline they transfered you to the police - wrong! and then go out when ever they got the time - wrong!


Transferred me directly to the police after giving me their DPSS case number. There's a little law in California requiring reporting to law enforcement personnel within 36 hours. Your internet scholarship doesn't cut it with a professional who works in the area.

You're quite the defender of GoodK and his story aren't you, even though he refuses to say whether he ever made the report in Utah. (I really don't know Utah procedure, I must admit.) You are in good company.


I'm an internet scholar? Is there an internet scholarship? I don't know anything about Utah. I know you think you know something you really know nothing about.
I want to fly!
_GoodK

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _GoodK »

rcrocket wrote:
You're quite the defender of GoodK and his story aren't you, even though he refuses to say whether he ever made the report in Utah.


I don't know what you're talking about, I haven't refused to say anything.

To be honest, I'm still quite shocked at the PM you sent me. Not very becoming of a Latter Day Saint, Mr. Crocket.

But I'm done for the night. Sleep well. :wink:
Locked