I once ate a hotdog at the same time that an airplane flew over my head. It causes me to suspect that the consumption of hotdogs make airplanes appear.
Why would an airplane suddenly appear? We know that airplanes and long cylindrical objects... just like hotdogs. We also know that food is often served on an airplane, the baggage handling guys are little wieners, and a lot of stewardesses have great buns. And what's more, they used to serve hotdogs at the theater that I saw the movie "Airplane." Whoa...
I think there are way too many fishy things going on here for this to all be a coincidence.
This is seriously funny!
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
I once ate a hotdog at the same time that an airplane flew over my head. It causes me to suspect that the consumption of hotdogs make airplanes appear.
Why would an airplane suddenly appear? We know that airplanes and long cylindrical objects... just like hotdogs. We also know that food is often served on an airplane, the baggage handling guys are little wieners, and a lot of stewardesses have great buns. And what's more, they used to serve hotdogs at the theater that I saw the movie "Airplane." Whoa...
I think there are way too many fishy things going on here for this to all be a coincidence.
This is seriously funny!
And true too. All except the part about food being served on airplanes. Whatever that stuff is, it's not food.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Trevor wrote:One detail, if Scratch is just graduating, it is unlikely he has passed the bar yet. It would be pretty gutsy to start getting into a law suit without even having passed the bar.
I don't think Scratch is Goodk's principal legal counsel. If you read GoodK's posts about talking to an attorney, you will be left with the strong impression that Scratch is not the attorney GoodK is referring to. My theory is that Scratch is helping behind the scenes in sort of an attorney-consulting role, but does not wish to actually represent GoodK in court.
Will this theory include the need for Mormon Discussions to file an Amicus brief or for Some Schmo to be be called to testify in order to introduce colorful language?
moksha wrote:Will this theory include the need for Mormon Discussions to file an Amicus brief or for Some Schmo to be be called to testify in order to introduce colorful language?
I suspect at least one of the parties will introduce a great deal of colorful language, should they ever make it into a courtroom.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Some Schmo wrote:I once ate a hotdog at the same time that an airplane flew over my head. It causes me to suspect that the consumption of hotdogs makes airplanes appear.
Why would an airplane suddenly appear? We know that airplanes are long cylindrical objects... just like hotdogs. We also know that food is often served on an airplane, the baggage handling guys are little wieners, and a lot of stewardesses have great buns. And what's more, they used to serve hotdogs at the theater that I saw the movie "Airplane." Whoa...
I think there are way too many fishy things going on here for this to all be a coincidence.
What? You're saying my theory isn't iron-clad?
At least I provided more evidence than Scratch usually did to support his wild theories.
Ray A wrote:Was Scratch's blog deleted, or is it just private?
I deleted it at his request.
Incidentally, Mister Scratch recently re-established contact with me. He specifically requested that this information be shared, so this isn't a violation of Universal Rule #3. Speaking of DCP, he has this to say:
And, you can let him know, either on the board, or via PM, that I have nothing whatsoever to do with GoodK. I have not spoken with, PMed, emailed, or otherwise conversed in any way, shape, or form with GoodK on this matter. Nor have I ever had anything to do with the USC law school. (Aside from having a much more general association w/ USC, of course.) So, I'm not secretly "pulling the stings" behind the scenes, or anything like that. for what it's worth.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Scratch just got tired of posting on the board. He is most likely seeking a new life away from the board. I wish him luck and a safe journey wherever he may go and do. He is a good guy at heart, that I can tell from his posts. But...a change of life was in order for him and that is not so bad for anyone.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
Dang. Another perfectly good conspiracy theory bites the dust in the cold light of day.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
