Kishkumen wrote:Of course, I do not know GoodK's stepfather. I suppose I could be completely wrong. My apologies in advance if I am.
Bob never met a post he couldn't selectively read to his own rhetorical advantage, but, alas, we can always return to the original post. Technology, lovely.
Kind of like a "test" right? Right hand giveth, left hand taketh away.
Trevor wrote:I knew someone would have to pick up where Scratch left off. You may be right. He sounds a lot like Scratch. Sigh. When will the madness end?
Little Ms. Trevor has his panties in a bunch. So sad. You had such promise until you went all soft on Mr. Peterson. I yearn for the days when you had your head on straight. Scratch liked you, and then you suddenly turned on him at the very time when his research into the motivations behind Mopologetics were really starting to go places. Seems like he let you off pretty easy, considering the way you stabbed him in the back after sending such adulatory PMs to him. I don't blame him for threatening to post them. I really don't.
Kishkumen wrote:I yearn for the days when you had your head on straight. Scratch liked you, and then you suddenly turned on him at the very time when his research into the motivations behind Mopologetics were really starting to go places. Seems like he let you off pretty easy, considering the way you stabbed him in the back after sending such adulatory PMs to him. I don't blame him for threatening to post them. I really don't.
I make no apologies for my current position. I admit that I like Scratch in some ways, and that was the basis of my comments to him over PM. Was I being inconsistent? I know it would appear that I was, but I could not anticipate that the discussion would help me see Mormon apologists in quite a different light. I don't expect you to understand that, or approve, but that is the way it is. Personally, I thought his threat to post those PMs was pretty low, and I don't think that I have forgiven him for it.
So, if you are Scratch, then there you have it. Frankly, I don't care whether you are or not.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
Kishkumen wrote:I both commend you on your research and am truly flattered that you would compare my humble offerings here to the Titanic imagination and rhetorical flair of Mr. Scratch. I simply cannot take credit for his work. It would be wrong to do so.
No one but Scratch himself would say something like this. Game, set, match.
Last edited by Guest on Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Trevor wrote:So, if you are Scratch, then there you have it. Frankly, I don't care whether you are or not.
Puh! Yeah, that will fly. I bet you are positively salivating to know who Scratch is. If you had any guts, you would have stuck to your guns, but you are nothing but a mealy-mouthed waffler.
Disgusting. You can't even admit how fascinated you are with Mr. Scratch. Probably because you crave the approval of Mr. Peterson and his ilk. I'll be waiting for a rebaptism invitation. I won't promise that I will come, but I can't wait to be proven right.
So Scratch, why did you suddenly and dramaticly drop your primary alter-ego? What could have possibly motivated you to take such drastic action right when you were at the cusp of blowing Mopologetics wide open? Was someone getting close to finding out your real life identity? Did you finally graduate from USC law school and now you want to move on to a higher-brow online-presence (not much higher, but a little)?
rcrocket wrote:If this guy knows nothing of Church history and doctrine, and instead harps on what people have said in posts and PMs, then it is indeed Scratch.
Tell me Scratch, what is the 20th word on page 231 of the CHC, Vol. 3?