John Larsen wrote:I don't think it is a worry. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. I have posted under my own name for the last 6 years or so with no repercussion. I have even hosted public post Mormon events and been quoted in the newspaper. Nothing. Not that I wouldn't enjoy an excommunication, but no dice.
It depends on your situation. When I reapplied for a restoration of temple blessings in 2000 (which I aborted, much to the SP's disappointment, it took a long time to get approval, and I in fact aborted before it came, and removed my name from the Church records) I had bishop and stake president interviews (which were almost interrogations about "past activities"), and I was told, by the SP, that my "case" was in the hands of a senior member of the Twelve. I believe it was Elder Nelson, If I recall correctly. No doubt they were "scrutinising" everything I had written to that time. They could not have done this without the help of the SCMC, I believe.
If you're out, and out for good, it's unlikely to affect you. But if someone wanted to reapply for baptism, they too would be scrutinised. Likewise
active members of the Church. For example, if a candidate's name for bishop was submitted by the SP, it could conceivably be scrutinised. Your situation, if I understand it correctly, would not be a threat (I don't know if you're exed or name-removed).
They are more "interested" in
internal dissenters, and as in the case of Lavina Fielding Anderson - keeping them out until they "repent".