If you look at the idea BC mentioned about the natural man (id) being the enemy of God in Freudian terms, it would lead you to the conclusion that the superego is the holy portion of the human psyche. However, it seems that these to sides merely obscess about sex differently. The id wants sex and the superego wishes to repress sex, but attention to sex is still at the forefront.
Ah! The psuedo science of psychology. The "science" that brings us Kinsey and NAMBLA.
Stray thought: Could this repressive attitude toward sex have solved the problem of polygamy?
I certainly agree that there are some bishops who take the advice on what to ask for too far or too much. I've actually encountered several of these and set them straight.
This board is certainly preoccupied with the sex life of Joseph Smith. Most are having a fantasy about it. Here is Joseph Smith with Fanny...here is Joseph Smith with Eliza dillydallying away. His libido is huge...etc etc etc...But then again why not...since many societies are experiencing a pornofication of their lifeworld, why would I assume less especially from the americans on this board.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
why me wrote:This board is certainly preoccupied with the sex life of Joseph Smith. Most are having a fantasy about it. Here is Joseph Smith with Fanny...here is Joseph Smith with Eliza dillydallying away. His libido is huge...etc etc etc...But then again why not...since many societies are experiencing a pornofication of their lifeworld, why would I assume less especially from the americans on this board.
Hey, don't leave Australia out. The reason for that is because sex topics are verboten on MAD. If it were not so, it would be no different. After all, who started all the "sex talk". Does "happiness is the purpose and design of existence...." ring a bell?
why me wrote:This board is certainly preoccupied with the sex life of Joseph Smith. Most are having a fantasy about it. Here is Joseph Smith with Fanny...here is Joseph Smith with Eliza dillydallying away. His libido is huge...etc etc etc...But then again why not...since many societies are experiencing a pornofication of their lifeworld, why would I assume less especially from the americans on this board.
Hey, don't leave Australia out. The reason for that is because sex topics are verboten on MAD. If it were not so, it would be no different. After all, who started all the "sex talk". Does "happiness is the purpose and design of existence...." ring a bell?
I am more than willing to discuss the history of pornography from the 1970s to the present day. I have no problem with a sex discussion. But the preoccupation of Joseph Smith's sex life as illustrated by the critics et al. just shows a certain sense of obsession or justification for their present status as exers.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith