Why does this argument sound so darn familiar? I just can't quite place it... oh yeah, that's right. It's the very same argument that the Mormons refuse to apply to their own leaders (or to Martha's father, himself).
You know, cinepro, it's too bad you're banned from there. I would LOVE to see you (or anyone else, for that matter) bring the implications of that post to their attention.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
You know, cinepro, it's too bad you're banned from there. I would LOVE to see you (or anyone else, for that matter) bring the implications of that post to their attention.
Look at post #15 in that thread...
I suspect that anyone who gets within 10ft of making a comparison would feel the wrath of the moderational cattle-prod.
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley
"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
LOL again! I don't know what's funnier; Smac97's initial statement or his epic failure to grasp cinepro's point.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
That's definitely signature line-worthy material, but I strongly suspect that unless someone SPECIFICALLY uses the name "Joseph Smith" in reference to his two sentences, Smac97 still won't get it.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"