Mormonism's Greatest Downfall.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: Mormonism's Greatest Downfall.

Post by _why me »

Pokatator wrote:

In your argument against horny toadism I can see a point in that direction, Joe married married women and then turned them back to their husbands. The reasons for that could be many. Maybe they weren't a good lay. Maybe they weren't as pretty. Maybe he was afraid of the husbands but brave enough to lay with them at least once and taste the goods. I don't know the real reasons.

But I do know that no matter which way you look at this practice of polygamy and Joe's use of if it has every look of sinfulness and if that is horny toadism then it is horny toadism. I can take that stance. The stance I can't take is that all of this behavior is from God. There is no way that God sanctioned all this behavior. God, man, common sense, Mormon or Catholic knows what marriage is and what adultery is. This all makes more sense to claim this came from Satan masquerading as an "Angel of Light" than to say it comes from God.



Horny toadism was a term for the critics who were claiming that Joseph Smith was lustful and a sexaholic. It implies a horny toadism. I just don't see it that way. He married many women during a two year period before his death. Why? Because he got horny?? I don't think so. He obviously thought that this was something that was required by him to do. I see no evidence that he was excited by polygamy. I see just the opposite. I see no silava coming from his mouth as he went about marrying women as his plural wives. But I do see a man in a hurry. Why? What was driving him to do what he did? Did he have a suicide wish? Did he get the antsy pantsies?? He knew the problems that it would cause Emma. And we have section 132 in the D&C which is a look into God's mind or if a critic, Joseph Smith's mind.

But something was driving him forward.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Re: Mormonism's Greatest Downfall.

Post by _truth dancer »

Hi Why Me,

Well let me put it this way. Apologists have no problem with Joseph Smith's sex life. It is the critics who seem to have the problem and who are reading much into it.


I think this is a good example of how belief can alter ones sense of integrity, morality, decency, truth, and goodness. Seems people will excuse pretty much anything if they believe (or convince themselves) God is at the helm.

Apologists don't have a problem. And so, is god one sick dude? No. But certainly people with agendas who see horny toadism in Joseph Smith's action seem to be a little perverted.


Who is perverted? Those who believe in faithfulness, marriage, fidelity, and honesty, the ones who love their partner and honor their vows? Or a God who seems to be utterly, completely absorbed with the sex life of Joseph Smith to the point of sending an angel with a drawn sword demanding Joseph Smith break the hearts of the daughters of God? A God who intervenes in the marriage of Joseph Smith to the point of telling him what girls and women he is to screw? A God who is truly obsessed with the sex lives of a handful of humans? A God who admits polygamy breaks the hearts of his daughters yet demands men break their hearts?

I mean seriously Why Me, you don't think this is a little strange to claim the God of the Universe is such a being? Again, is God as interested in the sex life of animals? What is it about human sexuality that creates this obsession in God?

Polygamy was instituted by god.


Funny how so many men claim this. :lol: I really don't like men blaming God for their indiscretions and cruelty.

He had his reasons.


Men have always created God in their image.

Joseph Smith during the period 1841 to 1843 began to marry many women. Why?


For the exact same reasons wealthy and powerful men have, throughout history claimed it is their right/duty/privilege to have multiple sexual partners. Joseph Smith is no different than all the other men who figure out a way to screw girls and women in the name of God.

sex???


And power.

Seems devotees of a sect, cult, or religion find ways to excuse their leader for anything and everything.

The excuses don't fly for anyone other than believers. Weird that one has to have faith to twist cruelty and lies into truth.

~td~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_Yoda

Re: Mormonism's Greatest Downfall.

Post by _Yoda »

Why Me wrote:And we have section 132 in the D&C which is a look into God's mind or if a critic, Joseph Smith's mind.


The counsel to Emma in section 132 has always been problematic for me. It seems completely inconsistent with the rest of God's character. He tells Emma that she simply has to let Joseph marry these other women or be destroyed. He goes on to say that He has come up with this "principle" or "commandment" to "try you all".

It's like God is some type of sick sadist just throwing a trial out there to see what his chosen people will do with it. And for what purpose? For what end? That is never explained.

If you accept section 132 as the true word of God, then, as TD has stated, God becomes one sick SOB.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Mormonism's Greatest Downfall.

Post by _harmony »

liz3564 wrote:If you accept section 132 as the true word of God, then, as TD has stated, God becomes one sick SOB.


Which is the #1 reason to feel quite comfortable saying God had nothing to do with Sec 132.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Mormonism's Greatest Downfall.

Post by _harmony »

why me wrote:Well let me put it this way. Apologists have no problem with Joseph Smith's sex life.


Apologists may have no problem with adultery, fornication, lying from the pulpit, and unrighteous dominion, but God does, and God will not be mocked.

And the way we know this is that Joseph was the only prophet whoever died before he'd lived out his life. God withdrew his protection and things went to hell in handbasket.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Mormonism's Greatest Downfall.

Post by _Dr. Shades »

harmony wrote:And the way we know this is that Joseph was the only prophet whoever died before he'd lived out his life.

Well, there is evidence that Brigham Young died from arsenic poisoning.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Mormonism's Greatest Downfall.

Post by _harmony »

Dr. Shades wrote:
harmony wrote:And the way we know this is that Joseph was the only prophet whoever died before he'd lived out his life.

Well, there is evidence that Brigham Young died from arsenic poisoning.


Really? Gotta link?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Re: Mormonism's Greatest Downfall.

Post by _Pokatator »

why me wrote:I see no silava coming from his mouth as he went about marrying women as his plural wives.


You are one strange dude, where are you seeing his mouth saliva or no saliva? Stick with reality and you think critics are out on a limb.

why me wrote:But I do see a man in a hurry.


whyme, he had to be in a hurry to service that many wives. Maybe he was into that revolutionary sex, in other words, he was a minuteman.

why me wrote:Why? What was driving him to do what he did? Did he have a suicide wish? Did he get the antsy pantsies??


The door is still open for an insanity defense.
I think it would be morally right to lie about your religion to edit the article favorably.
bcspace
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Mormonism's Greatest Downfall.

Post by _Dr. Shades »

harmony wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:Well, there is evidence that Brigham Young died from arsenic poisoning.

Really? Gotta link?

Who Done It? The Nagging Mystery of Brigham Young's Last Moments
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Mormonism's Greatest Downfall.

Post by _harmony »

(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply