The Anti-Atheist: Part 1

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Re: The Anti-Atheist: Part 1

Post by _Mercury »

Nightlion wrote:
You must be too young to remember Ervil LaBaron, or the Lafferty brothers. :eek:


You must be too stupid to examine what you are typing.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_Nightlion
_Emeritus
Posts: 9899
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:11 pm

Re: The Anti-Atheist: Part 1

Post by _Nightlion »

Mercury wrote:
Nightlion wrote:
You must be too young to remember Ervil LaBaron, or the Lafferty brothers. :eek:


You must be too stupid to examine what you are typing.


Do you need a hug? I love you. There,kissy better.
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Re: The Anti-Atheist: Part 1

Post by _Mercury »

Nightlion wrote:
Image



I don't want you anywhere near me for fear you and your inbred brethren will want to enact blood atonement.
Last edited by FAST Enterprise [Crawler] on Tue May 26, 2009 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: The Anti-Atheist: Part 1

Post by _Dr. Shades »

That's a point I hadn't considered.

Nightlion, what's your view of blood atonement? Is it a true doctrine? If so, who, in your opinion, is qualified to put it into practice?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Nightlion
_Emeritus
Posts: 9899
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:11 pm

Re: The Anti-Atheist: Part 1

Post by _Nightlion »

Mercury wrote:
Nightlion wrote:
Image



I don't want you anywhere near me for fear you and your inbred brethren will want to enact blood atonement.


I would be more like to step in and take a bullet for you.
Love the pink peanuts.
_Nightlion
_Emeritus
Posts: 9899
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:11 pm

Re: The Anti-Atheist: Part 1

Post by _Nightlion »

Dr. Shades wrote:That's a point I hadn't considered.

Nightlion, what's your view of blood atonement? Is it a true doctrine? If so, who, in your opinion, is qualified to put it into practice?


I would not call it a doctrine. Why? I could think that if a man shed innocent blood then he might want to have his blood shed.
The person who wants to take advantage of it, for his own sake, is the only one I can image would be qualified to put it into practice.
Like Gary Gilmore did. Some executions give no option either way.

I think that a few of the most evil Druid bastards that infiltrated the LDS Church, in the prophecied (Rev 12) flood out of the dragon's mouth, made a name for themselves on the fronteer by seeing to it that many died on the plains, and their cult knew who done it, and the MMM was there act of defiling the Church, so there is a sordid underbelly attached to the Church by these designs to take it down from any possibility of a Zion society to a worldly model that evil men could lead and prosper at.

ain't it funny how often the Mountain Meadow Massacre is refreshed again and again and again that the LDS psyche takes that hit over and over again with their treasured defilement? What was Hinckley thinking building a shrine on the spot? Or was it just ever so dear? HMMM?

Bishop Glen Pace investigated the legacy of these abominations that continue to this day. I should not say anymore.
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: The Anti-Atheist: Part 1

Post by _Some Schmo »

Nightlion wrote:
Mercury wrote:In all seriousness babe, start taking others advice and have a good talk with a psychiatric professional. All jokes aside, you do fit the profile of someone with issues. Please take this advice, and if you have in the past but are not currently seeking help then go back. You wil become a more productive member of society, you will have more chances for upward mobility and by learning to recognize fact from the fiction you create in your head.


As a Christian it warrants me true and faithful to be disparaged anti-social and beside myself in the eyes of pearl stompers, as was my Master. You think Satan a fiction which serves him well that you resist none of his crafty programming. You can consider my madness an attempt to deprogram the world from the chain of darkness that enslaves all your thinking to bend through his prism: THE FEAR OF THE WORLD

If there really was a devil, I think he would love you blaming my behavior on him. Who needs personal responsibility when "the devil made me do it?" I consider belief in a devil to be even more juvenile than a belief in a god. Stuff like "Satan wants you to not believe in him" is so maniacally ridiculous, one wonders where to begin with it. Suffice it to say that we could say that about anything we make up. “The Great Pink Elephant from Space likes that you don’t believe in her, because she thinks it makes people who do too special (or insert any other arbitrary reason).” See? Who are you to not believe in the Great Pink Elephant from Space?

When it comes right down to it, Satan has more integrity than god, if you believe the lore. At least Satan doesn't hide from you because he wants you to believe in him like god does.

:rolleyes:

Now let's assume for a second Jesus actually did exist, and just for fun, let's even pretend he was actually the son of the maker of the universe: if he actually talked like you talk, there's a reason he was killed. He sounded nuts, and he was apparently influencing people. Lucky for you, laws prevents the killing of the crazy people these days.

It seems to me that if your mission is to spread whatever "the word" is to those who need to hear it, you'd be much better off sounding sane when you did it. The valid criticism leveled at atheists (sounding smug in their communication does not help their cause if their cause is to actually convince others of their POV) works both ways. Delivery is the key.

Tell you what: I'll not talk to you like an arrogant prick if you stop talking like a banana wearing a wrap-around jacket. Deal? Otherwise, Merc has a point about the medication you should be taking.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Nightlion
_Emeritus
Posts: 9899
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:11 pm

Re: The Anti-Atheist: Part 1

Post by _Nightlion »

Some Schmo wrote:Tell you what: I'll not talk to you like an arrogant prick if you stop talking like a banana wearing a wrap-around jacket. Deal? Otherwise, Merc has a point about the medication you should be taking.


I too would that you were hot or cold. So I got no problem with you being a prick. Merc tambian.

Your not waffleing and feeling guilty now are you? Slipping on your thoughts of banana peels? Hmmm?

I encountered Satan once face to face, but a few feet apart, as he was attempting to scare me off. Probably thought he could not lose if I ever mentioned it that would cast a satisfactory doubt over me in the eyes of the people. He had to take a shot. Never came back again for what? nearly forty years now.

Your intellectually stylized prejudice cannot Trump experience.
My experience with God is abundant and proven consistent with the witnesses down through the ages. You cannot appreciate what ignoramouses you and Merc are to the likes of me.
Your learned confidence is just that, something you learned, like how to ride a one trick pony. But it is more fun at times to clash with those who sling with vigour than prod against lukewarmitude.
Last edited by Guest on Tue May 26, 2009 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Re: The Anti-Atheist: Part 1

Post by _Mercury »

To the nutjob fundy posting as nightlion:

Wow dude, if I knew where you were I'd call the state mental health authorities to get you brought in so as to prevent another elizabeth smart. Then again I am sure Jon Krakauer is looking for material for followup to Under the Banner of Heaven, so maybe if we keep you loose
we might see a sequel.

Seriously dude, you are worse than Skains.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_Nightlion
_Emeritus
Posts: 9899
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:11 pm

Re: The Anti-Atheist: Part 1

Post by _Nightlion »

Mercury wrote:To the nutjob fundy posting as nightlion:
Seriously dude, you are worse than Skains.


don't know no Skains.
You got another tack, track, line, angle, bent, slant or am I going to deal with this adnauseam.
I think you have well disinformed the public mind, and will do no better.
Post Reply