karl61 wrote:nevo wrote:
"Except for the little problem of Rigdon not showing up as a scribe until chapter 7"
which is HUGE:
http://mi.BYU.edu/publications/jbms/?vo ... m=1&id=462
If we postulate that Rigdon was nothing other than a scribe for Joseph Smith, then
his showing up at Waterloo after a couple of dozen pages of Genesis had been already
been "translated," merely shows that he had nothing to do with that "translation."
If, on the other hand, we interpret that early history in a way that makes Rigdon
more than a mere scribe for the JST text, then we must look at the pages already
written out, to see if they show any signs of Rigdon authorship. If they do reveal
the presence of his "word-print" or theology, then we might want to investigate
to see how he might have transmitted those first pages to Smith, before he (Rigdon)
left Ohio for New York in Dec. of 1830.
Other than hand-carrying those pages, while on a clandestine visit to Seneca Co.,
how else might Rigdon have provided Smith with the initial pages of the JST?
And, besides attempting to answer the "how," we might also ask ourselves "why?"
If Rigdon was the primary author of the JST, why did he not simply hand-carry the
entire set of biblical changes/additions with him in Dec. of 1830, and sit down with
Smith, upon his arrival, and start "translating" from the very beginning then? Why
have the "translating" process begin before Rigdon makes his much noted arrival
among Smith's followers in NY? What purpose would that have served?
UD