LDS Security Detains Affectionate (Gay) Couple on Plaza

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Daniel2
_Emeritus
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:57 pm

LDS Security Detains Affectionate (Gay) Couple on Plaza

Post by _Daniel2 »

I haven't seen this issue being discussed, yet, but having a bit of an obligation to be "the resident gay-LDS issues guy," I'm bringing it to everyone's attention...

LDS Security Detains Affectionate Couple on Plaza
http://www.kutv.com/content/news/local/story/LDS-Security-Detains-Affectionate-Couple-on-Plaza/dDPAkZRcvEajlCOQ4gBDNg.cspx

A gay couple says their public display of affection got them banned from LDS church property and cited for trespassing.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints says the incident had nothing to do with the couple being gay, and all had to do with crossing the line of public affection.

Matt Anue and Derek Jones live in Salt Lake City and have been partners for five years. They were walking home from an event at about 10:30 on Thursday night.

They say they were walking through the LDS church plaza located on Main Street between North and South Temple, when Matt publicly displayed his affection for Derek.

"I stopped I said something I put my arm around him and I kissed him on the side of the cheek," said Anue.

That's when they say several LDS Security officers approached them and asked them to leave because of inappropriate behavior.

"I immediately put my arm around him {Derek} and said what were we doing wrong? What were we doing wrong?" said Anue.

"It came out {from the officers} what we were doing was just plain wrong, it was inappropriate, it was gross," said Jones.

When they refused to leave, that's when they say security converged upon them and handcuffed both of them.

When asked why they didn't just leave Jones said, "We didn't leave because we didn't feel we had to…we did nothing more wrong then anyone else yet we where forced on the ground handcuffed."

"I knew they were targeting us because we are gay and I was trying to get it out of them," said Anue.

Salt Lake City police where called and Jones and Anue were cited for trespassing.

The LDS Church released a statement by spokesperson Kim Farah saying, "Two individuals came on Church property and were politely asked to stop engaging in inappropriate behavior-just as any other couple would have been. They became argumentative and used profanity and refused to leave the property. They were arrested and then given a citation for criminal trespass by SLPD."

The City of Salt Lake sold the portion of Main Street to the LDS church back in 2003, under a very controversial sale.

According to law, the church has every right to decide who can be on that property and who can't.

"They are the owner of that property and they have a say as to what is allowed on that property. If someone is on that property that they don't want them and they ask them to leave and they refuse then they are trespassing," said Sgt. Robin Snyder with the Salt Lake City police department.

Jones and Anue are not allowed on LDS church property for six months. Their citations are class C misdemeanors.

Copyright 2009 Four Points. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



My take...?

Given that the LDS church bought the property, it's security officers were well within their legal rights to ask the couple to leave, and to have them arrested for tresspassing when the couple refused.

I also think it is pretty darn foolish to try to make the case that this gay couple was treated the same as any other "affectionate" couple would have been, given all the kissing newlyweds that smooch all over that plaza while professional photographers document the practice.

The church tries to continue to paint itself as "pro-family, not anti-gay," that nothing is expected of gays that isn't expected of striaghts, or gays aren't treated any differently than straights are. This incident just further reinforces how dumb that argument sounds and how obviously false it is, in practical application.

My view,
Darin
"Have compassion for everyone you meet even if they don't want it. What seems conceit, bad manners, or cynicism is always a sign of things no ears have heard, no eyes have seen. You do not know what wars are going on down there where the spirit meets the bone."--Miller Williams
_sethpayne
_Emeritus
Posts: 691
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:41 pm

Re: LDS Security Detains Affectionate (Gay) Couple on Plaza

Post by _sethpayne »

Darin wrote:I haven't seen this issue being discussed, yet, but having a bit of an obligation to be "the resident gay-LDS issues guy," I'm bringing it to everyone's attention...

LDS Security Detains Affectionate Couple on Plaza
http://www.kutv.com/content/news/local/story/LDS-Security-Detains-Affectionate-Couple-on-Plaza/dDPAkZRcvEajlCOQ4gBDNg.cspx

A gay couple says their public display of affection got them banned from LDS church property and cited for trespassing.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints says the incident had nothing to do with the couple being gay, and all had to do with crossing the line of public affection.

Matt Anue and Derek Jones live in Salt Lake City and have been partners for five years. They were walking home from an event at about 10:30 on Thursday night.

They say they were walking through the LDS church plaza located on Main Street between North and South Temple, when Matt publicly displayed his affection for Derek.

"I stopped I said something I put my arm around him and I kissed him on the side of the cheek," said Anue.

That's when they say several LDS Security officers approached them and asked them to leave because of inappropriate behavior.

"I immediately put my arm around him {Derek} and said what were we doing wrong? What were we doing wrong?" said Anue.

"It came out {from the officers} what we were doing was just plain wrong, it was inappropriate, it was gross," said Jones.

When they refused to leave, that's when they say security converged upon them and handcuffed both of them.

When asked why they didn't just leave Jones said, "We didn't leave because we didn't feel we had to…we did nothing more wrong then anyone else yet we where forced on the ground handcuffed."

"I knew they were targeting us because we are gay and I was trying to get it out of them," said Anue.

Salt Lake City police where called and Jones and Anue were cited for trespassing.

The LDS Church released a statement by spokesperson Kim Farah saying, "Two individuals came on Church property and were politely asked to stop engaging in inappropriate behavior-just as any other couple would have been. They became argumentative and used profanity and refused to leave the property. They were arrested and then given a citation for criminal trespass by SLPD."

The City of Salt Lake sold the portion of Main Street to the LDS church back in 2003, under a very controversial sale.

According to law, the church has every right to decide who can be on that property and who can't.

"They are the owner of that property and they have a say as to what is allowed on that property. If someone is on that property that they don't want them and they ask them to leave and they refuse then they are trespassing," said Sgt. Robin Snyder with the Salt Lake City police department.

Jones and Anue are not allowed on LDS church property for six months. Their citations are class C misdemeanors.

Copyright 2009 Four Points. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



My take...?

Given that the LDS church bought the property, it's security officers were well within their legal rights to ask the couple to leave, and to have them arrested for tresspassing when the couple refused.

I also think it is pretty darn foolish to try to make the case that this gay couple was treated the same as any other "affectionate" couple would have been, given all the kissing newlyweds that smooch all over that plaza while professional photographers document the practice.

The church tries to continue to paint itself as "pro-family, not anti-gay," that nothing is expected of gays that isn't expected of striaghts, or gays aren't treated any differently than straights are. This incident just further reinforces how dumb that argument sounds and how obviously false it is, in practical application.

My view,
Darin


This type of crap makes me embarrassed to be a Mormon. *sigh*
_Morrissey
_Emeritus
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:42 am

Re: LDS Security Detains Affectionate (Gay) Couple on Plaza

Post by _Morrissey »

Would gay couples hold hands also be escorted off the premises for public indecency? I would like to see the SLC gay community test LDS Inc to see just how it defines public indecency by trying various stages of public affection within the Plaza and then send in hetero couples to do the same things and see what happens. Anyone care to guess what the outcome of this experiment will be?
_The Dude
_Emeritus
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am

Re: LDS Security Detains Affectionate (Gay) Couple on Plaza

Post by _The Dude »

Bruno was wrong. Utah is the gayest part of America, not Alabama.
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: LDS Security Detains Affectionate (Gay) Couple on Plaza

Post by _krose »

"A little bit of Paris in Salt Lake City..."

Indeed.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Re: LDS Security Detains Affectionate (Gay) Couple on Plaza

Post by _Gazelam »

No Taser?
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: LDS Security Detains Affectionate (Gay) Couple on Plaza

Post by _moksha »

Gazelam wrote:No Taser?


You are right. We are too soft on those who refuse to admit that marriage is between a man and women.

:biggrin:
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_hobart
_Emeritus
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:15 am

Re: LDS Security Detains Affectionate (Gay) Couple on Plaza

Post by _hobart »

Morrissey wrote:Would gay couples hold hands also be escorted off the premises for public indecency? I would like to see the SLC gay community test LDS Inc to see just how it defines public indecency by trying various stages of public affection within the Plaza and then send in hetero couples to do the same things and see what happens. Anyone care to guess what the outcome of this experiment will be?


They weren't detained for "public indecency," but for trespassing after being asked to leave. Double standard? Of course, but why are we surprised the LDS church doesn't want gay people around? Of course gay people aren't supposed to share any affection, not just what heterosexual people are forbidden to do in the church.

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_12811907
http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_12818762
_zzyzx
_Emeritus
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:31 pm

Re: LDS Security Detains Affectionate (Gay) Couple on Plaza

Post by _zzyzx »

They stayed on the property questioning the Security goons when asked to leave.
"A little bit of Paris"... occupied by Nazis.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be a mile away and you'll have their shoes.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: LDS Security Detains Affectionate (Gay) Couple on Plaza

Post by _beastie »

Obviously they were not treated like any other couple. Heterosexual couples kiss all the time all temple grounds, particularly just after getting married.

Now, if they were french kissing and showing a lot of tongue in the process, maybe a heterosexual couple would get asked to leave. But a kiss on the cheek and holding hands? Never.

On past threads about the church's attitude towards homosexuals, when the canard arises that the church opposes homosexual acts in the same way it opposes any sexual acts outside of marriage, it's been pointed out that the church would not be comfortable with a gay couple sitting in sacrament, holding hands, or caressing one another's back, the way heterosexual couples do. The church would act in a disciplinary way towards a homosexual couple that was dating and kissing, but not having sex. So clearly the church is being coy here - they obviously oppose homosexuality, not just homosexual sex.

Back in the old days, leaders of the church were more willing to spit in the face of larger society and aggressively assert their real beliefs about gentiles, african-americans, etc. Today, the church is extremely PR conscious, and this is leading to the transparently false statements they make about homosexuality.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
Post Reply