Danny C Peterson has offended me. (Edited to be nicer.)

[_Gadianton Plumber]

So, the question I am mulling over is would DANNY rat me out to his mods? He does have a history of ratting people out who offended him to people not relevant to the discussion. Has anyone ever thought he may have had a hand in their banning?

[_harmony]

So, the question I am mulling over is would DANNY rat me out to his mods? He does have a history of ratting people out who offended him to people not relevant to the discussion. Has anyone ever thought he may have had a hand in their banning?

He had no hand in my banning. The wench did that all by herself. She doesn't like having the spotlight pointed at her lies.



x

[_Jersey Girl]

They definitely do it, Paul. They banned a ton of us because we post on this board. I got banned with all the others and I hadn't posted there in a month. Go figure.

That's because you're a bad girl with a tank top.

I'm covered up.

Paul O

Holy crap! You can see me?

[_Gadianton Plumber]

And here we have, for our further edification, yet another thread started by a poster banned from MAD.

Good grief. Get down on your knees and thank your lucky stars for the ban! It's your ticket to freedom!

OK, one more time because I am slow. It's a good thing I am no longer allowed?

[_Paul Osborne]

Holy crap! You can see me?

Yeah, I can see the shapes and curves just perfectly in my computer. I even ran my mouse over them! Didn't it tickle?



Paul O

[_harmony]

And here we have, for our further edification, yet another thread started by a poster banned from MAD.

Good grief. Get down on your knees and thank your lucky stars for the ban! It's your ticket to freedom!

OK, one more time because I am slow. It's a good thing I am no longer allowed?

Yes. Why would you want to go to a place that treats you like dirt?

[_Gadianton Plumber]

Because so many of the Mopologists won't come over here?

[_harmony]

Because so many of the Mopologists won't come over here?

You discount a few:

Daniel is here
Crock is here
Ben is here
Consigliori is here
Jason Bourne is here
LifeonaPlate is here
WhyMe is here
Nevo is here
Her Amun is here
Gazelum is here
even Pahoran is here (for now. You watch. He'll bail soon. I suspect he won't be able to stand the heat much longer).

Juliann is not here. May heaven preserve her soul, she could not survive here and she knows it. She lives to troll on MDB anonymously, to try to enforce her own unrighteous dominion onto us here, to control what is said here; were it not so, you and many others would not be banned from MAD for things written on MDB. (with me, it's personal for her. And that's okay, because everyone needs someone to hate. She really hates being shown as the liar she is).

The only reason MAD still exists is because of the critics. The apologists are not the impetus behind MAD, the critics are. You support Juliann, her ego, her agenda, and her moderation policies every time you post there. You muzzle your thoughts, trying to creep under her radar. And in doing so, you cheapen them, and in the process, you cheapen yourself.

She did you a favor by banning you. You are now free.

[_Gadianton]

I am personally against name calling, and especially against it when directed toward unrelated things like looks, occupation, personal problems like family/legal issues etc. So there is no way I can support GP calling DCP names.

I can also virtually guarantee GP the DCP didn't rat him out.

But I very much disagree with scotty that DCP can fight his own battles.

It kind of goes like this, a critic goes toe to toe with DCP. It escalates. Both are equally guilty usually in the escalation. DCP has a very difficult time letting things go, he pulls various tactics to end the matter, but if the critic is equally stubborn, at some point DCP will "grow weary" of participation and leave the board.

Obviously, given DCP is the supreme leader of apologetics, any Mormon apologetic related board's greatest honor is to have DCP participate. As the noted cycle above has happened several times, LDS moderators know they have to smack down critics that are bothering DCP before things get out of hand. This goes to some extent for any "high profile" apologist.

Hey, you have to give MAD some credit. It took a lot of guts for them to pull a "Godwin's Law" on Hamblin. But look what happened when they did? At the mere suggestion that he tone things down just a little they lost the apologist's #2. Brackite can update us if he reads this on how long since his last post.

[_Dr. Shades]

Gadianton has hit the nail on the head. Please pay special attention to his second-to-last paragraph, above. That's the key to understanding why you were banned.

Never fear, however: Unlike any other message board, we here at MormonDiscussions allow cross-posting. So if you see something on MA&D to which you wish to respond, simply copy-and-paste it here and add your comments.

So they don't have you totally hamstrung, ban notwithstanding.