Daniel Peterson wrote:You might want to pause for thought, though. Sometime.
hmmm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . naah!
Daniel Peterson wrote:You might want to pause for thought, though. Sometime.
Daniel Peterson wrote:Analyze away. Devote as much energy to it as you wish. Post about it to your heart's content. I'll be listening to either Palestrina or Richard Strauss (I haven't yet decided) while working on notes for the lecture that I have to deliver on Sunday on behalf of the Islamic Center of Orlando. (There. That should feed the appetites here for a while longer.)
Dr. Daniel C. Peterson,
Professor of Islamic Studies and Arabic
Brigham Young University
Author of: Muhammad, Prophet of God
Analytics wrote:I had a discussion about this with Gardner about six months ago....<snip>
selek wrote:
What I find so interesting about MAD (and also one reason I don't bother posting there anymore) is that, regardless of how logical, rational, or reasonable an argument is, the mopoligists will not budge an inch.
Daniel Peterson wrote:So far as I'm aware, neither Brant Gardner nor Bill Hamblin pays any attention to this place, so challenging them here is pretty silly.
As for me, Joey, my interest in you and your issue is at a very low ebb, at least for the moment. It was never very strong in the first place.