William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_William Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:58 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _William Schryver »

RockSlider wrote:
Doctor Scratch wrote:---Falsely accusing Dan Vogel of improper citation
---Lying to Dan Vogel by way of his Chozah/Provis sockpuppet
---Stalking and harassing Runtu using his Wheat sockpuppet


I did go and register on mad and did some searching for Dan, endnote, etc. but did not come across it readily. It did read several of Mr. Schryver's latest posts, as well as his responses to the thread he originated and linked for me. In what I read, his presence there was respectful.

So, how about it Mr. Schryver ... you seem to keep throwing down the gauntlet of show me the worst ... how about a link to this thread so I can read it for myself?

Ask and ye shall receive:

Vogel's The Making of a Prophet

(Bear in mind that this whole thread was intended as a bit of an ironic joke; a response to the frequent (at the time) attacks made on Hugh Nibley's alleged footnote errors.)
... every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol ...
_Ray A

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Ray A »

William Schryver wrote:Hee, hee, hee. Yeah, except that the citation WAS in error, and Dan admitted it. But keep at your myth-building. Eventually, it might take.


I didn't see anywhere on the thread where Vogel admitted it was an error, but maybe I missed it.

Your concluding post (for which the mods re-opened the thread) ended with:

William Schryver wrote:This thread has obviously run its course. Neither side is persuaded – again. No surprise there. I will be checking on the status and actual location of Ms d 3408 fd 4 later this week and will report it in the KEP thread in the Pundits forum.


Did you check, and did Vogel later concede an error in Pundits?
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _RockSlider »

Mr. Schryver;

Thanks for the link, Good read.

For the record (based on the read), I've been calling you Mr. Schryver because you have chosen to modify my moniker to something derogatory, and I desired to address you as respectfully as I can. Bill might be too personal for you, how about William in the future?

Apparently the Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde remains consistent even in a thread that your enemies point out as an example. For a comparison, take Mr. Pedersen's postings ... you can clearly see this is the same author in both boards. He treats opponents the same in both places. His manner of speech is the same. You on the other hand ... well your posting speaks for itself.

If you had the balls to be a "Golden Kimball" type, I would admire that trait, but I have less respect for the Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde traits than I would for your soft core vulgarity used ... only on this site.

As for the argument at hand in the thread, seems to this outsider you got caught with your pants down.
_cksalmon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:20 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _cksalmon »

RockSlider wrote:Mr. Schryver;

Thanks for the link, Good read.

For the record (based on the read), I've been calling you Mr. Schryver because you have chosen to modify my moniker to something derogatory, and I desired to address you as respectfully as I can. Bill might be too personal for you, how about William in the future?

Apparently the Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde remains consistent even in a thread that your enemies point out as an example. For a comparison, take Mr. Pedersen's postings ... you can clearly see this is the same author in both boards. He treats opponents the same in both places. His manner of speech is the same. You on the other hand ... well your posting speaks for itself.

If you had the balls to be a "Golden Kimball" type, I would admire that trait, but I have less respect for the Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde traits than I would for your soft core vulgarity used ... only on this site.

As for the argument at hand in the thread, seems to this outsider you got caught with your pants down.


Through no fault of your own, Relief Society, you've unfortunately encouraged William Schryver to renewed discussion of his favorite topic: William Schryver. This, his personal "bad penny" fetish, is well-known to interested readers.

My very unsolicited advice would be not to encourage his predilection to luxuriate in all things Schryver.

cks
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _RockSlider »

cksalmon wrote:...


sounds like solid advice
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _beastie »

Through no fault of your own, Relief Society, you've unfortunately encouraged William Schryver to renewed discussion of his favorite topic: William Schryver. This, his personal "bad penny" fetish, is well-known to interested readers.

My very unsolicited advice would be not to encourage his predilection to luxuriate in all things Schryver.


I've never seen a more apt or concise summary.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_William Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:58 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _William Schryver »

Backslider:
If you had the balls to be a "Golden Kimball" type, I would admire that trait, but I have less respect for the Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde traits than I would for your soft core vulgarity used ... only on this site.

Yes, well I’m still waiting for examples of this “soft core vulgarity” of which I am accused. Please feel free to cite these examples at your earliest convenience.

As for the argument at hand in the thread, seems to this outsider you got caught with your pants down.

Consider me not surprised that this is your conclusion. It has become abundantly clear where your allegiances lie, and established allegiance is what it’s all about when it comes to assessing the outcome of any debate on LDS-related message boards.
.
.
.
Chrissie Kellie Salmon:
… his personal "bad penny" fetish, is well-known to interested readers.

And always of especial interest to you, I’ve noticed.
.
.
.
beastlie:
I've never seen a more apt or concise summary.

As she assumes her appointed place in the circle …
... every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol ...
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _moksha »

So Will, what is up with all the provocative language? It is just a means of cathartic release?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_William Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:58 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _William Schryver »

moksha wrote:So Will, what is up with all the provocative language? It is just a means of cathartic release?

???

Please specify. I was not aware of having employed any "provocative language."
... every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol ...
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _moksha »

William Schryver wrote:
moksha wrote:So Will, what is up with all the provocative language? It is just a means of cathartic release?

???

Please specify. I was not aware of having employed any "provocative language."


Page one was many posts ago, but what Pokatator quoted certainly seems provocative. So was it a form of cathartic release?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Post Reply