harmony wrote:Without reciprocity, it's the ol' patting harmony on her po' lil head again.
It was a sincere offer of help. I'm sorry that you prefer to view it as condescension.
harmony wrote:Without reciprocity, it's the ol' patting harmony on her po' lil head again.
Daniel Peterson wrote:I hadn't really understood it before tonight, harmony, but I'm beginning to see that you genuinely dislike men.
If true, that explains a lot of disparate things that have puzzled me about your posts.
If it's true, I'm genuinely sorry. I myself would hate to live in a world in which I disliked and mistrusted half of its population a priori. That would be perfectly awful.
As it is, I like people. Everywhere. Men and women. Different religions. Almost all of them. I really do.
Paul Osborne wrote:I have to agree with Daniel about Harmony disliking men.
Paul O
Daniel Peterson wrote:harmony wrote:Without reciprocity, it's the ol' patting harmony on her po' lil head again.
It was a sincere offer of help. I'm sorry that you prefer to view it as condescension.
liz3564 wrote:For the record, from what I have observed based on conversations I have had with both Gaz and Dan, I would put them in that same category, even though I still have differences in my understanding of all of this.
asbestosman wrote:I've been reading a book about human nature which has made me think a bit about polygamy, monogamy, and other human relationships. The book mostly talks about adults, not children so what I say about children is based primarily on what I've heard about jealousy in children and my own thoughts.
By nature, women want a long term relationship with a man who is likely to be a good daddy. They don't want to have to compete with other women's children. Jealousy serves a great purpose.
Children also experience jealousy of their siblings. Sibling rivalries are hard for kids at times. They don't want to compete with siblings for the attention and care of their parents and in some ways this is good for their own survival.
That's not to say the the jealousy of children is similar to that of adults for each other. For one thing, adults invest a lot of energy into maintaining the family structure. Having another adult take away from that is in some ways more unfair since the other adult has to pick up the slack. The child isn't personally invested in quite the same way since the child does not provide labor to the family unit--the child simply receives less when sibling arrive (at least until they learn how siblings often make the most convenient friends).
Women also, by nature, are more attracted to men with the higher testosterone men when they are most fertile. The combination of the two makes for the best chances for their offspring.
Now none of that means women (or men or children) are defined by natural inclinations nor are all such inclinations equal in importance, intensity, or moral validity. I also don't think that's the full story on why polygamy is so hard but I think it's part of it. However, much of our moral reasoning is based on a more intuitive part of our brains. Many things we simply see as wrong or right even when we can't quite explain it. Moreover psychology has shown that we will often try to find reasons after we've reached a conclusion.
That's not to say that intuitive reasoning is bad. With training, it is very often superior to analytical thinking in both speed and accuracy. Psychology has demonstrated this with various games proving that we are often more rational when we make choices intuitively than when we deliberate.
I'm not even sure you have any idea how hard this is for me.