Did someone say horses?

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Did someone say horses?

Post by _Gazelam »

Image

Landscapers were digging a hole for a pond in the back yard of a Boulder, Colorado home when their equipment uncovered a cache of 83 stone tools that had been buried by a person in the Clovis era. What is even more fascinating is that some of the tools had protein residues from extinct animals (camels, horses, sheep, bear), probably as a result of the original owner having used the scrapers to strip meat and/or prepare hides for use. Those protein residues allowed the cache to be dated to about 13,000 years before the present.
The Mahaffy Cache consists of 83 stone implements ranging from salad plate-sized, elegantly crafted bifacial knives and a unique tool resembling a double-bitted axe to small blades and flint scraps...

The artifacts were buried in a coarse, sandy sediment overlain by dark, clay-like soil and appear to have been cached on the edge of an ancient stream, said Bamforth. "It looks like someone gathered together some of their most spectacular tools and other ordinary scraps of potentially useful material and stuck them all into a small hole in the ground, fully expecting to come back at a later date and retrieve them."

A 2008 study led by the University of Oregon offers evidence that a cadre of comets exploded over North America about 12,900 years ago, triggering massive fires that caused the extinction of ice-age mammals and perhaps even the Clovis people.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_Phaedrus Ut
_Emeritus
Posts: 524
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:55 pm

Re: Did someone say horses?

Post by _Phaedrus Ut »

Are you completely ignorant of the history of North American megafauna and their extinction as it relates to the arrival of humans on the continent? Or are you just feigning ignorance?


Phaedrus
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Did someone say horses?

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Gazelam wrote:What is even more fascinating is that some of the tools had protein residues from extinct animals (camels, horses, sheep, bear), probably as a result of the original owner having used the scrapers to strip meat and/or prepare hides for use. Those protein residues allowed the cache to be dated to about 13,000 years before the present.

So, how do you account for horses being here 7,000 years before the Fall of Adam?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Re: Did someone say horses?

Post by _Scottie »

Do you have a link to this story?
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Re: Did someone say horses?

Post by _Sethbag »

I read Manfred's link, watched the little video and whatnot, and the bottom line is it still says that these and other animals mentioned in the story had gone extinct in the Americas during a timeframe that is still many thousands of years too old for their to have been Nephites and Lamanites around. I'm not sure what new evidence or meaning this is supposed to have in the context of the Book of Mormon, Gaz. Care to share with us your point?
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_Nightlion
_Emeritus
Posts: 9899
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:11 pm

Re: Did someone say horses?

Post by _Nightlion »

Gazelam wrote: dated to about 13,000 years before the present.


Why not date them 13,000,000,000 is not that more credible?
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Re: Did someone say horses?

Post by _Sethbag »

Nightlion wrote:
Gazelam wrote: dated to about 13,000 years before the present.


Why not date them 13,000,000,000 is not that more credible?


No, it isn't.
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: Did someone say horses?

Post by _Some Schmo »

Nightlion wrote:
Gazelam wrote: dated to about 13,000 years before the present.


Why not date them 13,000,000,000 is not that more credible?

Given that the Earth is only about 4,600,000,000 years old, it is decidedly not more credible.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_StructureCop
_Emeritus
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:05 pm

Re: Did someone say horses?

Post by _StructureCop »

Those horses didn't die until the fall of Adam. Or, I mean, the ones that weren't deliberately killed and eaten didn't die. :confused: The main obstacle to recovering full-sized horse remains contemporary to the Nephites is that they were restricted to a very small geographic area, and their bodies quickly deteriorated after death until they completely disappeared.
The missing roll theory can go to hell. -- Paul Osborne

The evidence will never be compelling for either side of the argument in rational terms. -- John Clark
Post Reply