A question for The Nehor

[_Doctor Scratch]

Your theory....based on virtually no evidence....that I am the only person would actually know.

Look, The Nehor: people lie to themselves all the time. I'm not saying that this is necessarily the case with you, but it has been known to happen. This, "I am the only person would actually know [sic]" argument is quite lame.

I spoke about nebbish because I don't think it fits. Hardly evidence that I cry when people make fun of my personal appearance.

No one said that you "cry." You do engage in behavior reflective of embarrassment, though. (That's probably why you can't resist posting again and again on this thread. If the argument was so "evidence free," I imagine that you'd just ignore it.)

I haven't backed down on my assertion that I heard Jesus in a dream. I did. In fact, I spoke about it again not long ago.

You are too embarrassed to fully explicate and defend what happened, and what was said. Likewise:

I also insist that I saw a God and have never recanted.

You expressed regret over having said this. You also failed to delve into details when asked. More evidence. More embarrassment.

[_RockSlider]

...

just a bit odd

[_The Nehor]

Your theory....based on virtually no evidence....that I am the only person would actually know.

Look, The Nehor: people lie to themselves all the time. I'm not saying that this is necessarily the case with you, but it has been known to happen. This, "I am the only person would actually know [sic]" argument is quite lame.

It's not lame when it's true and the person accusing the other of lying has no idea what he's talking about, doesn't know the person he's talking about, and is basing his pop psychology off a few internet posts. THAT is lame.

I spoke about nebbish because I don't think it fits. Hardly evidence that I cry when people make fun of my personal appearance.

No one said that you "cry." You do engage in behavior reflective of embarrassment, though. (That's probably why you can't resist posting again and again on this thread. If the argument was so "evidence free," I imagine that you'd just ignore it.)

I obviously meant 'cry' in the general sense of being hurt. This illustrates again that you have no idea what I'm doing.

"If the argument was so 'evidence free,' I imagine that you'd just ignore it."

Classic. If you defend yourself from the accusations it's a confession that the evidence is strong. So you're saying that the Church and Apologetics have a lot of merit to them and are highly significant and the argument for the truthfulness of the LDS faith is incredibly strong and that is why you fight them? Be careful with your generalities.

I haven't backed down on my assertion that I heard Jesus in a dream. I did. In fact, I spoke about it again not long ago.

You are too embarrassed to fully explicate and defend what happened, and what was said. Likewise:

Embarrassment has nothing to do with why I don't explain it. As for defense, it happened. I hardly think me telling details would convince you or anyone else it actually happened.

I also insist that I saw a God and have never recanted.

You expressed regret over having said this. You also failed to delve into details when asked. More evidence. More embarrassment.

I did express regret over sharing it and I even gave my reasons. They should sound familiar. They're the same ones almost every LDS member will give you if you want to delve into their spiritual experiences. You have chosen to ignore this and make up your own to suit your paranoid agenda. That sounds like a personal mental fault.

This wonderful waffling around with scant evidence to support your claims must be humiliating.

I pity you.