why me wrote:Gadianton Plumber wrote:But that's not what they were attesting to. They said they saw the metal plates, right? Is it beyond imaginable that Joseph Smith could have made metal plates? I wonder why the witnesses are cited as irrefutable evidence of the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon if all they are claiming is that they saw metal plates, gold in appearance? Why is it convincing to you, whyme?
And then we have the three witnesses who saw the angel and the plates. No one ever denied their testimony even though both Oliver and David had good reason to do so. Most of the witnesses took their testimony to their death and gave it again on their deathbed.
Joseph must have had a knack for doing all this in secret away from Emma and family. Difficult to do. The making of metal plates may be a noisey prospect and easy to discover. And then if we have sidney involved, the idea becomes even more absurd.
OK, so we are down to three witnesses. These three people said they saw angels, right? They also never went back on their word, right? If I could show you a similar attestation of something else that is not true, would that discount these three?
I will cite if you need anything.
Seven people attested that Solomon Spaulding told them he was the author of the Book of Mormon.
Many others attested that they witnessed similar occurrences support the prophetic mantle of Jesse Strang, including some of the original witnesses of the Book of Mormon.
Do these witness mean Strang is a true prophet, did Spaulding really write the Book of Mormon, or are witness sometimes unreliable?
Does this discount the original 3?