Doctor Scratch wrote:That a great question, dblagent. Here's an interesting, follow-up, "thought experiment" question: If the MI knew about additional Joseph Smith children, would they publish their findings? Or would they try to cover it up?
I think there would be silence. I can't imagine that they would publish their findings.
John Larsen wrote:John Hamer? He's been helping out with the Joseph Smith papers project.
Is John Hamer a 40-ish, long-haired guy?
Even if he is, why would the Joseph Smith papers require Ugo Perego to conduct a paternity test?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Doctor Scratch wrote:What I have learned is that (allegedly) sometime earlier this year, a very "fishy" meeting took place at the Maxwell Institute offices. As my "source" put it, "some tall 40ish guy with long hair came into the MI offices and was very quickly hustled into a conference room." Following this stranger into the conference room were Paul Hoskisson, DCP, Louis Midgley, and, most intriguingly, Ugo Perego and one of Hugh Nibley's sons. These individuals apparently stayed in the conference room for quite some time.
Who is Paul Hoskisson?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Hold on a second. . . upon further thought, it looks like I was wrong about something: Why would the long-haired guy be escorted into a closed-door meeting unless he was already determined to be a Smith descendant, which would mean that Perego would have already completed such "paternity testing" in advance? It makes no sense that he would be paid to conduct a second test. There's obviously something else afoot here. . . unless, like I said, they're trying to figure out who else from the same female ancestor might be a descendant of Smith (as opposed to her legal, legitimate husband). I didn't think any Nibley children were closely associated with FARMS, hence the speculation about common Smith ancestry. Of course, if the Nibley clan DON'T trace ancestry from such a plural wife, then that makes the notion of a "paternity test" all the more bizarre.
It's probably more likely that we've found the Kwisatz Haderach.
You could have stopped right there Slim. That's as far as you needed to go.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us
- President Ezra Taft Benson
I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.
Now people holding a meeting on their own premises during daylight hours while other people unrelated to the meeting are in the building is now clandestine.
By your standards virtually every meeting that ever occurred is clandestine. Are congressional meetings also clandestine Scratch? Board meetings? The time I asked a guy I worked with to join me in my office to discuss a project? This board?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
I'm really intrigued by this new piece of intelligence. Just think, a secret meeting between mopologetic power brokers to keep something under wraps. That something must be incredibly important. The whole paternity/genetics stuff isn't exactly my area, I'm really enjoying some of the scenarios Shades has considered.
No doubt, the apologists at MAD are going to flip out over this one. Their reaction should tell us something interesting about the nature of the meeting I think.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.
LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
He's a Hebrew expert guy. A straight shooter from what I know, sort of on the fringe of apologetics.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.
LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.