William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_sethpayne
_Emeritus
Posts: 691
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:41 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _sethpayne »

Tell me, though, what is a "cracker?" Do you know?


Indeed I do. It is a racial slur on par with the word nigger, often used to describe white people.

It can also be a crunchy snack.

Your insensitivity knows no bounds.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Darth J »

"Cracker, sometimes white cracker, is a usually disparaging term for poor whites, mainly used in the Southern United States, but in recent decades in usage throughout North America."

...............

"Historically the word suggested poor, white rural Americans with little formal education."
_sethpayne
_Emeritus
Posts: 691
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:41 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _sethpayne »

Darth J wrote:"Cracker, sometimes white cracker, is a usually disparaging term for poor whites, mainly used in the Southern United States, but in recent decades in usage throughout North America."

...............

"Historically the word suggested poor, white rural Americans with little formal education."


Thanks Darth, for providing additional insight into Will's use of a racist slur. Note that he describes this place as a trailer park.... and one of its participants as a cracker.

I wonder what Jesus would post.
_William Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:58 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _William Schryver »

sethpayne wrote:
Tell me, though, what is a "cracker?" Do you know?


Indeed I do. It is a racial slur on par with the word n*****, often used to describe white people.

"A racial slur on par with the word n*****?" LOL! (again)

I never cease to be amazed at how the criteria for vulgarity, racism, and all other manner of human despicability are customized to such a remarkable degree whenever apostates seek to characterize me. Oh, well, I have long since observed that the stature of a man can be very accurately assessed by the nature of his enemies.

Your insensitivity knows no bounds.

It is very true that I have become utterly insensitive to the venom of a generation of spineless vipers.
... every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol ...
_sethpayne
_Emeritus
Posts: 691
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:41 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _sethpayne »

I never cease to be amazed at how the criteria for vulgarity, racism, and all other manner of human despicability are customized to such a remarkable degree whenever apostates seek to characterize me. Oh, well, I have long since observed that the stature of a man can be very accurately assessed by the nature of his enemies.


I'm an apostate? Better call my Bishop, my EQP and my Home Teaching families. PM me and I will gladly supply you with the appropriate contact information.

I am not your enemy, Will. I have said many times how intelligent you are. I simply find your manner offensive and off putting. You remind me of how much I love my Bishop because he is absolutely nothing like you.


It is very true that I have become utterly insensitive to the venom of a generation of spineless vipers.


The spineless man must resort to base language (circle jerk), sexism, sexual innuendo, and racial slurs in an attempt to make his point.

You have valid arguments. Do yourself the favor of shedding the nasty exterior.
_William Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:58 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _William Schryver »

sethpayne wrote:
I never cease to be amazed at how the criteria for vulgarity, racism, and all other manner of human despicability are customized to such a remarkable degree whenever apostates seek to characterize me. Oh, well, I have long since observed that the stature of a man can be very accurately assessed by the nature of his enemies.


I'm an apostate? Better call my Bishop, my EQP and my Home Teaching families. PM me and I will gladly supply you with the appropriate contact information.

I am not your enemy, Will. I have said many times how intelligent you are. I simply find your manner offensive and off putting. You remind me of how much I love my Bishop because he is absolutely nothing like you.


It is very true that I have become utterly insensitive to the venom of a generation of spineless vipers.


The spineless man must resort to base language (circle jerk), sexism, sexual innuendo, and racial slurs in an attempt to make his point.

You have valid arguments. Do yourself the favor of shedding the nasty exterior.

Of course you're an apostate! The fact that you continue to consort with the Saints is utterly irrelevant to your faith status, which marks you as one who clearly "stands apart" from them ("standing apart" being the fundamental meaning of "apostasy.") A very large proportion of Mormon apostates continues in nominal activity, for a variety of reasons, but primarily (I am convinced) because of the facility it affords them to evangelize unfaith, which they do with patient subtilty.

As for my allegedly "nasty exterior," it is a characterization rising from a myth created and nurtured by apostates and their sympathizers, thereby clearly indicating that the assessment is much more revealing of them than it is of me. It is not believed by anyone outside of The Great and Spacious Trailer Park©. Rather, the enmity and propaganda directed towards me by the denizens of this place is viewed, as well it should be, as my personal "badge of honor."

Again, the stature of a man can be very accurately assessed by the nature of his enemies, even those who insist "I am no enemy."
... every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol ...
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Darth J »

In summary:

If you think OCDroopy is an asshole: you are a leftist.

If you think Will is an asshole: you are apostate.

If you demonstrate that you know what you are talking about and OCDroppy does not: you are a poseur.

If you tell Will that he is being an asshole: you are vindicating his righteousness.

If Will says objectively offensive things, or says things that would make South Park embarrassed: he's defending the Church.

If you call Will names or say offensive things to him: you are persecuting him because he is righteous.

If you are an active, believing member of the LDS Church who thinks Will is a douchebag: you're apostate.

If you are an active, believing member of the Church who interprets the scriptures in a way that conflicts with OCDroopy's AM radio platitudes: you are apostate.

Don't worry, Will. When your own apostasy from the Church's teachings and conducting yourself in a way that is offensive to someone claiming to defend Jesus' true church reach their logical destination, we will forgive and forget. Unlike the judgmental, self-righteous TBM's whose side you still pretend to be on.

"The fact that you continue to consort with the Saints is utterly irrelevant to your faith status, which marks you as one who clearly "stands apart" from them ("standing apart" being the fundamental meaning of "apostasy.")"
_Nimrod
_Emeritus
Posts: 1923
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:51 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Nimrod »

Darth J wrote:In summary:

If you think OCDroopy is an asshole: you are a leftist.

If you think Will is an asshole: you are apostate.

If you demonstrate that you know what you are talking about and OCDroppy does not: you are a poseur.

If you tell Will that he is being an asshole: you are vindicating his righteousness.

If Will says objectively offensive things, or says things that would make South Park embarrassed: he's defending the Church.

If you call Will names or say offensive things to him: you are persecuting him because he is righteous.

If you are an active, believing member of the LDS Church who thinks Will is a douchebag: you're apostate.

If you are an active, believing member of the Church who interprets the scriptures in a way that conflicts with OCDroopy's AM radio platitudes: you are apostate.

Don't worry, Will. When your own apostasy from the Church's teachings and conducting yourself in a way that is offensive to someone claiming to defend Jesus' true church reach their logical destination, we will forgive and forget. Unlike the judgmental, self-righteous TBM's whose side you still pretend to be on.

"The fact that you continue to consort with the Saints is utterly irrelevant to your faith status, which marks you as one who clearly "stands apart" from them ("standing apart" being the fundamental meaning of "apostasy.")"

By these standards, I am an apostate persecuting Will because of (and thereby vindicating) his righteousness; I am also a leftist poseur.
--*--
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Trevor »

Nimrod wrote:By these standards, I am an apostate persecuting Will because of (and thereby vindicating) his righteousness; I am also a leftist poseur.


Was there ever any question? ;-)
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
_sethpayne
_Emeritus
Posts: 691
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:41 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _sethpayne »

Of course you're an apostate! The fact that you continue to consort with the Saints is utterly irrelevant to your faith status, which marks you as one who clearly "stands apart" from them ("standing apart" being the fundamental meaning of "apostasy.") A very large proportion of Mormon apostates continues in nominal activity, for a variety of reasons, but primarily (I am convinced) because of the facility it affords them to evangelize unfaith, which they do with patient subtilty.


You have lost all touch will reality.

Why don't you call my Bishop and see how much I "evangelize unfaith" as I serve within my ward? I dare you. No, I double dare you. In fact, I'll make it easy for you.

Stake: Manhattan, NY
Ward: Morningside Heights Ward
Bishop: John Moe

I'm sure you have access to a directory that provides his office phone number. I'm sure he'd be very interested to learn that there is a wolf among his flock. Put up or shut up, Will. Put your money where your mouth is. If you believe I represent a danger to the Church and evangelize unfaith, then you have a moral duty to alert my Priesthood leaders. Please, don't shirk your responsibilities.

My faith: Serve my community and promote the ethics, life, and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth. Show people that God loves them despite their faults, shortcomings, and struggles. Build people up through the messages in the Bible, Book of Mormon, D&C and PoGP. Use the teachings of the Church and the standard works as a framework for sharing this message.

Your faith: Believe exactly as I do or you are an apostate "standing apart" from the Saints. If you believe differently than I do I will belittle you, use foul language to harass you and attempt to "shame you" into believing as I do.

Dare I say that there are atheists on this board who demonstrate more Christ-like qualities than you do. You represent the worst kind of know-it-all Mormon. Again, I love my Bishop and other ward leaders and members because they are absolutely nothing like you.

You are a small, paranoid little man, Will.

As for my allegedly "nasty exterior," it is a characterization rising from a myth created and nurtured by apostates and their sympathizers, thereby clearly indicating that the assessment is much more revealing of them than it is of me. It is not believed by anyone outside of The Great and Spacious Trailer Park©. Rather, the enmity and propaganda directed towards me by the denizens of this place is viewed, as well it should be, as my personal "badge of honor."


A myth? You have demonstrated your nastiness and paranoia right here on this thread! There is no myth. This is fact. There is no propaganda. Your online persona is one of a mean-spirited and paranoid man. I pray that this is only an online persona and that you behave more civilly in real-life. God help your ward and stake members if what we see here is who you really are.

Didn't you mention that you are on the high council in your Stake? May I suggest the next time you visit a ward that you give a talk on circle jerk crackers and the danger they represent to the Church.

Again, the stature of a man can be very accurately assessed by the nature of his enemies, even those who insist "I am no enemy."


There goes your paranoia again. Here you have a person (me) complimenting you on your good qualities and encouraging you behave more like Christ and you consider me an enemy.

You have lost all touch with reality.
Last edited by Guest on Mon May 31, 2010 3:49 am, edited 2 times in total.
Post Reply