Markk wrote:Celestial can be applied to planets, stars...etc In and apart from it use in the Bible, the same can be said about terrestial, these are words with meanings and define the context of the Cor. text.
And telestial has a meaning and defines the context of several restoration texts. Are you arguing that "telestial" cannot be a word because "terrestrial" and "celestial" are more common?
Markk wrote:What does telestial mean?
According to my etymology, it means "of the consummation," or "of the end." It refers to the final degree of glory.
Markk wrote:Your spinning a straw man argument.
If you honestly think that then you don't know what "straw man argument" means.
Markk wrote:The reality of this is there is absolutly no proof that the word has a actual meaning other than a supposed heavenly abode for evil people.
It doesn't have to have another "actual" meaning. The fact that you don't believe it refers to an actual region could not be any more irrelevant. You're trying way to hard to make a point you absolutely cannot make. Give it up.
Markk wrote:So in this context and the reality that celestial and terrestial actually have meanings...what does telestial mean apart from Joseph Smith application.
Why does it have to have a second meaning to be a real word? Only words with multiple meanings are real?
Markk wrote:I beleive maybe we should walk through Cor. 15 to understand this a little clearer?....fair?
That has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the legitimacy of the word "telestial." You're arguing based on your own subjective and rather uninformed assumptions about lexicography. The simple fact is, when a word has an established meaning and enters common usage, it becomes a perfectly legitimate word. This is an argument you cannot possibly win. You're just putting on a show of how dogmatic and irrational you can be.