In all probability...

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: In all probability...

Post by _sock puppet »

Lucinda wrote:
Porter wrote:But then again, you will not because you are now panty wearing exmormon woman! You will not GET to be one of many wives to a Mormon man god... I bet Simon has pity on you!
One of my happiest days through all of this was realizing I don't WANT to make it to the Mormon heaven. As soon as I realized that, the fear disappeared.

Hi, Lucinda,

Yes, that is the actual day of liberation, the day one realizes the Celestial Kingdom/Exaltation is not the place to spend eternity.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: In all probability...

Post by _Themis »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Polygamy-Porter wrote:You must remember that the Mormon god, who is a man, holds women in far less regard than men.


CFR


LOL D&C 132 is more then enough.
42
_Polygamy-Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8091
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:07 am

Re: In all probability...

Post by _Polygamy-Porter »

Lucinda wrote:
Porter wrote:But then again, you will not because you are now panty wearing exmormon woman! You will not GET to be one of many wives to a Mormon man god... I bet Simon has pity on you!
One of my happiest days through all of this was realizing I don't WANT to make it to the Mormon heaven. As soon as I realized that, the fear disappeared.

*cue light bulb idea sound effect*

At the next exmo conference in 2011, they should have an underwear fashion show!

Have the underwear models(men and women) come out on the cat walk with Mormon garmies on over the gentile undies they are modeling, then have them shed those hideous symbols of Mormon masonic myths as they model the new undies!

YES, both two piece and the old one piece jesus jammie jumpsuits would be used!
New name: Boaz
The most viewed "ignored" poster in Shady Acres® !
_beefcalf
_Emeritus
Posts: 1232
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:40 pm

Re: In all probability...

Post by _beefcalf »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Polygamy-Porter wrote:You must remember that the Mormon god, who is a man, holds women in far less regard than men.


CFR

How do I know this? LDS Theology. Men will become gods, and given many of these women as wives.


CFR



Heber C. Kimball wrote:In the spirit world there is an increase of males and females, there are millions of them, and if I am faithful all the time, and continue right along with brother Brigham, we will go to brother Joseph and say, "Here we are brother Joseph; we are here ourselves are we not, with none of the property we possessed in our probationary state, not even the rings on our fingers?" He will say to us, "Come along, my boys, we will give you a good suit of clothes. Where are your wives?" "They are back yonder; they would not follow us." "Never mind," says Joseph, "here are thousands, have all you want." Perhaps some do not believe that, but I am just simple enough to believe it. (JoD 4:209)


Referenced provided, as requested.
eschew obfuscation

"I'll let you believers in on a little secret: not only is the LDS church not really true, it's obviously not true." -Sethbag
_Simon Belmont

Re: In all probability...

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Heber C. Kimball wrote:In the spirit world there is an increase of males and females, there are millions of them, and if I am faithful all the time, and continue right along with brother Brigham, we will go to brother Joseph and say, "Here we are brother Joseph; we are here ourselves are we not, with none of the property we possessed in our probationary state, not even the rings on our fingers?" He will say to us, "Come along, my boys, we will give you a good suit of clothes. Where are your wives?" "They are back yonder; they would not follow us." "Never mind," says Joseph, "here are thousands, have all you want." Perhaps some do not believe that, but I am just simple enough to believe it. (JoD 4:209)




Not official doctrine. You should know this by now.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: In all probability...

Post by _harmony »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Polygamy-Porter wrote:You must remember that the Mormon god, who is a man, holds women in far less regard than men.


CFR

How do I know this? LDS Theology. Men will become gods, and given many of these women as wives.


CFR


How long has it been since you've been through the temple?

Don't play dumb. You know the doctrine as well as any other endowed member.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_beefcalf
_Emeritus
Posts: 1232
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:40 pm

Re: In all probability...

Post by _beefcalf »

Simon Belmont wrote:Not official doctrine. You should know this by now.


Very conveniently for mopologists of every stripe, NOTHING is "official doctrine".
eschew obfuscation

"I'll let you believers in on a little secret: not only is the LDS church not really true, it's obviously not true." -Sethbag
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: In all probability...

Post by _sock puppet »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Heber C. Kimball wrote:In the spirit world there is an increase of males and females, there are millions of them, and if I am faithful all the time, and continue right along with brother Brigham, we will go to brother Joseph and say, "Here we are brother Joseph; we are here ourselves are we not, with none of the property we possessed in our probationary state, not even the rings on our fingers?" He will say to us, "Come along, my boys, we will give you a good suit of clothes. Where are your wives?" "They are back yonder; they would not follow us." "Never mind," says Joseph, "here are thousands, have all you want." Perhaps some do not believe that, but I am just simple enough to believe it. (JoD 4:209)




Not official doctrine. You should know this by now.

I agree Simon, the COJCOLDS is devoid of 'official doctrine' these days.
_Redefined
_Emeritus
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:06 pm

Re: In all probability...

Post by _Redefined »

sock puppet wrote:
Simon Belmont wrote:
Okay, marvelous.


It would only be given a positive or even neutral adjective when tripping. Otherwise, it deserves only a negative adjective.


How 'bout marvelously absurd?
"Sometimes i feel so isolated, i wanna die."-Rock Mafia--The Big Bang
this one. . .
and this one!
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: In all probability...

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Hello,

That the Mormon god would think this man was deficient:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Whg7OmDF9V4&feature=player_embedded

V/R
Dr. Cam
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Post Reply