An omission from a Friend article... why?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.

Why do you think the article did not mention her marriage to Joseph Smith?

 
Total votes: 0

_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

An omission from a Friend article... why?

Post by _zeezrom »

Here is an article found on lds.org that describes some details of Zina Jacob's life. The article describes how she married Brigham Young.


Why do you think the article did not mention her marriage to Joseph Smith?
Was it: (please refer to the poll)

Thank you,

Zee.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: An omission from a Friend article... why?

Post by _zeezrom »

I need to add a question:

Do you think children are not bothered knowing Zina married BY because they do not actually know who BY was married to before her so it is kind of like throwing another rock in the hat which already has lots of rocks anyway?

If a child heard Zina married Joseph Smith, would they freak out because they currently only know of a single rock in the hat: Emma?

Maybe this was to protect the children...
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_Polygamy-Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8091
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:07 am

Re: An omission from a Friend article... why?

Post by _Polygamy-Porter »

"Some things that are true aren't very useful" -Boyd K. Packer

and

"Some things that are useful(for mormonsim) aren't very true" -Porter
New name: Boaz
The most viewed "ignored" poster in Shady Acres® !
_Baker
_Emeritus
Posts: 490
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:01 am

Re: An omission from a Friend article... why?

Post by _Baker »

"After Henry deserted Zina and the two little boys ..."

That's a bald face lie.
"I have more to boast of than ever any man had. I am the only man that has ever been able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam. ... Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus ever did it. I boast that no man ever did such a work as I." - Joseph Smith, 1844
_Polygamy-Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8091
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:07 am

Re: An omission from a Friend article... why?

Post by _Polygamy-Porter »

zeezrom wrote:I need to add a question:

Do you think children are not bothered knowing Zina married BY because they do not actually know who BY was married to before her so it is kind of like throwing another rock in the hat which already has lots of rocks anyway?

If a child heard Zina married Joseph Smith, would they freak out because they currently only know of a single rock in the hat: Emma?

Maybe this was to protect the children...
The reality of all of this Mormon history is had we been taught all of this BS (that we are now freaking about), taught this as a child, we would not be adults freaking out about it.

I think LDS Inc is very aware of this and is an about face from the past attempt to try and forget about it, and is now attempting to innoculate all members with a shot from Dr. Bushman.. all of course due to the great whore of truth, the infobahn.
Last edited by Guest on Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
New name: Boaz
The most viewed "ignored" poster in Shady Acres® !
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: An omission from a Friend article... why?

Post by _zeezrom »

Baker wrote:"After Henry deserted Zina and the two little boys ..."

That's a bald face lie.

Yeah, I thought that was interesting as well. It definitely takes away some of the truth to the matter.

Well, kids - the brainwashing begins....
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: An omission from a Friend article... why?

Post by _Quasimodo »

Polygamy-Porter wrote:
"Some things that are useful(for mormonsim) aren't very true" -Porter


Almost (but not quite) chiasmus, Porter :).
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_Polygamy-Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8091
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:07 am

Re: An omission from a Friend article... why?

Post by _Polygamy-Porter »

zeezrom wrote:
Baker wrote:"After Henry deserted Zina and the two little boys ..."

That's a bald face lie.

Yeah, I thought that was interesting as well. It definitely takes away some of the truth to the matter.

Well, kids - the brainwashing begins....

That article was dated 1989... smack in the middle of what I call the "omission plan"..



Given how many of the current adult members were raised during the omission era and the mainstreaming of the church to draw in more outsiders, its gonna be tough times ahead for LDS Inc as to what to teach and what to keep omitted..
New name: Boaz
The most viewed "ignored" poster in Shady Acres® !
_Polygamy-Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8091
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:07 am

Re: An omission from a Friend article... why?

Post by _Polygamy-Porter »

Lookie what the filthy whore of truth spit out her gaping hole for me!


Janet Peterson, the author of your 1989 friend article...


http://ldsmag.com/author/62

Who would like to contact her about her bald face lie in that article??
New name: Boaz
The most viewed "ignored" poster in Shady Acres® !
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: An omission from a Friend article... why?

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Image
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Post Reply