From My Informant: DCP & Schryver Ordered to Stand Down

[_MCB]

Correction:

Once again it is proven how limitless is the Mormon capability for creating elaborate fantasies out of whole cloth..... You've spent so many years building a fantasy world to deal with your inner sense of guilt and shame and fear that it finally overtaxes your brain's capacity to adapt.

The older a person gets, the more difficulty they have in making a radical transformation of their way of thinking. Both positive and negative personality characteristics become more accentuated. Again, there is a trend for all people, as they age, to become less adaptable, unless they have practiced adaptability throughout their lives.

[_Darth J]

Once again it is proven how limitless is the exmo capability for creating elaborate fantasies out of whole cloth. No wonder so many of you develop serious mental disabilities in old age, like Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia.

Fascinating Things I Have Learned From Mormon Apologists, #452:

*Alzheimer's Disease is caused by the way you think.*

Fascinating stuff there, "Nomad."

So, remember, apostates: creating elaborate fantasies out of whole cloth is going to give you dementia in your old age. Just like Ezra Taft Benson.

[_Joseph]

smion blemont wrote: "Well then, I have no reason to reject the truthfulness of my unicorn intel, since no one has proven that they do not exist, they must exist!"
-----------------------------------
******************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
++++++++++++================

There you have it folks, a true reason to invest in my Unicorn Ranch.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=15426&hilit=Unicorn

I don't expect blemit to invest as he still has not put up the $50,000 for the showdown to see if he or I have read more about Joseph Smith.

But, no less an authority than this joker believes. O'the power of the Holy Ghost and the burning in the bosom that lasts until you get out the jar of Tums.

[_Runtu]

What are you talking about? First off, I don't have an iPhone. Second, Ihave received no pictures of Will Schryver documenting his shenanigans.

Once again it is proven how limitless is the exmo capability for creating elaborate fantasies out of whole cloth. No wonder so many of you develop serious mental disabilities in old age, like Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia. You've spent so many years building a fantasy world to deal with your inner sense of guilt and shame and fear that it finally overtaxes your brain's capacity to adapt.

Why do you people have such an obsession about wanting to make myself and Schryver into the same person? I don't understand the motivation. Is it because you really believe it is not possible for anyone to support and agree with Schryver except himself? Well I've got some bad news for you ...

I don't think you're Will, for what it's worth. Wheat, maybe.LOL

It really doesn't matter who you are, anyway. I think the reason you're associated with Will is that you display the same contempt for others and sense of self-satisfaction. Plus, you didn't help yourself by unleashing a torrent of hate and spite recently.

You don't disgust me (though obviously the feeling isn't mutual), but I will say I find your behavior alternately funny and sad.

[_Gadianton]

Second, I have received no pictures of Will Schryver documenting his shenanigans.

Oh I see...

As I mentioned somewhere else on this board a week or so ago, I asked Will about this. He informed me of the details. He even sent me a picture of himself the day following the encounter. He had a pretty fat upper lip, but otherwise looked pretty good.

Once again it is proven how limitless is the exmo capability for creating elaborate fantasies out of whole cloth.

You mean by pointing out that you received pictures from Will (yourself) because you told us you had? That's a fantasy? I think they are turning your world around in Mopologetic school, Nomad. See, "reality" refers to things that actually happened, such as Will sending you a picture. "elaborate fantasy" refers to a ridiculously far-fetched stories about Abraham being transmitted in a secret code on an ancient Papyri which is then translated by a self-proclaimed prophet. Don't you think that any fair-minded person would say that out of the two of us, myself and Will, that I am the one discussing reality while Will is the one constructing elaborate fantasies?

Is it because you really believe it is not possible for anyone to support and agree with Schryver except himself? Well I've got some bad news for you ...

Not at all. I think Will is incredibly well-supported by FAIR. I think that all the nasty things that he has done only reflect badly on him to a small degree given the low expectations people naturally have of him, but reflect far worse on FAIR, as they are the ones who mastermind his work and have groomed him to be a future senior apologist.

I believe that you are Will because the things you say and the way you say them sound more or less like Will would say them.

[_RockSlider]

I believe that you are Will because the things you say and the way you say them sound more or less like Will would say them.

I got looking around the MAD's Nomad, there are some interesting and confusing numbers - account opened in 2006 but first post well over a year later, pundits group, but only three pundit posts. Two of these are in august of 2010 and could be viewed as simple setups for Further Light and Knowledge that is immediately provided by William. The third, older pundits post, references a Beastie public thread/debate and appears to be a different voice (based on reading several of the 2010 discussion group postings).

Very low post count, with activity in about 80 threads (3 in 2007, 18 in 2008, 21 in 2009 and 41 in 2010). Looking through several of the latest 2010 Nomad posts, they do tend to introduce a focused subject, provide little to no substance and then William shows up within a few posts and provides elaboration on the introduced point.

In contrast, the single older pundits post, Nomad provides a lot of substance and the linked Beastie thread Normad also provides substance.

Shared/repurposed pundits account?

[_Gadianton]

Fascinating research, Rockslider. I think the "re-purposed" theory is a good one.

[_Ray A]

I got looking around the MAD's Nomad, there are some interesting and confusing numbers - account opened in 2006 but first post well over a year later, pundits group, but only three pundit posts. Two of these are in august of 2010 and could be viewed as simple setups for Further Light and Knowledge that is immediately provided by William. The third, older pundits post, references a Beastie public thread/debate and appears to be a different voice (based on reading several of the 2010 discussion group postings).

Very low post count, with activity in about 80 threads (3 in 2007, 18 in 2008, 21 in 2009 and 41 in 2010). Looking through several of the latest 2010 Nomad posts, they do tend to introduce a focused subject, provide little to no substance and then William shows up within a few posts and provides elaboration on the introduced point.

In contrast, the single older pundits post, Nomad provides a lot of substance and the linked Beastie thread Normad also provides substance.

Shared/repurposed pundits account?

Our apologist fiend also created the fictitious moniker here which went by the moniker of Wheat. He initially used "Wheat" to shore up his Book of Abraham apologetics, but this character mysteriously appeared and disappeared, but not without having a go at myself and Runtu. In language that sounded so Schryver-like.

This is a man who creates sockpuppets to "support" him, because none here will. I don't think there's any love-lost between him and DCP either.

The more you examine the Internet/message board history of this apologist turd, the more you become convinced that he thinks absolutely nothing of "lying for the Lard".

[_Ray A]

How familiar does this post sound?:

Wheat’s wife and family agree with you.

As far as Schryver is concerned, at first I was somewhat put off by his approach to dealing with you folks. But I grew to understand and respect him as time went on. Does anyone know what happened to him?....

I don’t hate Runtu. I just agree with Shryver that Runtu is a phony. I’m sure he’s a nice guy in most ways. But I still think he’s a hard-core apostate who uses sneaky means to destory people’s faith.

http://mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/vie ... a&start=63

Nomad, anyone?

[_RockSlider]

I remember first coming here and my first reads of William's posting style on this board.

My reaction was, this guy is a regular Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

viewtopic.php?p=254015#p254015

I was shocked that he was representing the Church side of this fence in such a crude manner here, and putting on the sophisticated and righteous airs at MAD.

William really does have quite the skill at writing in at least two voice prints which the casual observer would never put the same man doing both writings. And these two styles, seemingly totally natural with no attempts to hide or conceal (Both posted by Williams's real name). It's easy to imagine that William has the skill at yet a third voice, one consciously concealed.

If this does happen to be the case, the fun part is that this third voice is not capable of providing him with the fix, the reward, the fulfillment which the first two voices so richly provide him. This third voice would have to forsake its purpose (to conceal), leaking through the voice we are so familiar with here. It must be driving him nuts to be so ham strung by the Brethern.

One would think this a dangerous game to play with God and his Prophets, Seers and Revelators.