The Cassius Review of Books: "About Baptism"

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: The Cassius Review of Books: "About Baptism"

Post by _Darth J »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Joseph wrote:Darth J wrote: "Oh, by the way: Emma Marr Petersen was the wife of Mark E. Petersen."
--------------------------------------
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%4*******************
------------++++++++++++++++++==============

I guess that explains why there are no Chinese or Negroes in the story.


Ah, so every possible race of peoples and each gender must have equal representation in each and every publication throughout time, else the Church is not true.


Simon Belmont, I just want to assure you that Mark E. Petersen was absolutely not a racist and never said anything that would lead a reasonable person to that conclusion.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: The Cassius Review of Books: "About Baptism"

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Hello,

I would like to second that notion, and to add that Mr. Young was definitely, not even remotely, a racist.

V/R
Dr. Cameron "NC" for Me
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: The Cassius Review of Books: "About Baptism"

Post by _ludwigm »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Joseph wrote:I guess that explains why there are no Chinese or Negroes in the story.

Ah, so every possible race of peoples and each gender must have equal representation in each and every publication throughout time, else the Church is not true.

You are true. Even there are publications where the negro race is overrepresented.
In "Race Problems—As They Affect the Church." at Brigham Young University on 27 August 1954 Elder Mark E. Petersen said
FAIRwiki wrote:... if the Negro accepts the gospel with real, sincere faith, and is really converted, to give him the blessings of baptism and the gift of the Holy Ghost. If that Negro is faithful all his days, he can and will enter the celestial kingdom. He will go there as a servant, but he will get a celestial resurrection ...

The response of FAIRwiki:
It is not clear what he meant by saying a faithful black would have to go "as a servant."

1. "the Negro" should be read as "black" to be more PC

2. servant by answers.com:
- One who is privately employed to perform domestic services.
- One who is publicly employed to perform services, as for a government.
- One who expresses submission, recognizance, or debt to another: your obedient servant.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Spurven Ten Sing
_Emeritus
Posts: 1284
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:01 am

Re: The Cassius Review of Books: "About Baptism"

Post by _Spurven Ten Sing »

Woe unto those who reject this gospel, and are destined to remain in Denmark for eternity!
I find this to be the funniest thing I have ever read.
"The best website in prehistory." -Paid Actor www.cavemandiaries.com
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: The Cassius Review of Books: "About Baptism"

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Darth J wrote:To retain plausible deniability, the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the position of Cassius University, Mormon Discussions, or the author himself.

And I find that to be the funniest thing I have ever read.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Simon Belmont

Re: The Cassius Review of Books: "About Baptism"

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Dr. Shades wrote:And I find that to be the funniest thing I have ever read.


And I find that to be the funniest thing I have ever read.
_Simon Belmont

Re: The Cassius Review of Books: "About Baptism"

Post by _Simon Belmont »

ludwigm wrote:You are true. Even there are publications where the negro race is overrepresented.


I do not consider other "races" to exist. We are all the "human race" therefore the "negro race" means nothing to me.
_Spurven Ten Sing
_Emeritus
Posts: 1284
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:01 am

Re: The Cassius Review of Books: "About Baptism"

Post by _Spurven Ten Sing »

Simon Belmont wrote:
ludwigm wrote:You are true. Even there are publications where the negro race is overrepresented.


I do not consider other "races" to exist. We are all the "human race" therefore the "negro race" means nothing to me.

The Negro Race means nothing to you?
"The best website in prehistory." -Paid Actor www.cavemandiaries.com
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: The Cassius Review of Books: "About Baptism"

Post by _Darth J »

Simon Belmont wrote:
ludwigm wrote:You are true. Even there are publications where the negro race is overrepresented.


I do not consider other "races" to exist. We are all the "human race" therefore the "negro race" means nothing to me.


Then you are in good company. There has never been an LDS prophet or apostle who has considered the "negro race" or other ethnicities to be separate races. No LDS Church leaders have ever taught this, and LDS Church policy has never, ever been based on racial divisions.
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: The Cassius Review of Books: "About Baptism"

Post by _sock puppet »

Darth J wrote:Are these second graders really able to understand making a lifelong commitment, which is what baptism is meant to entail? Is Larry getting baptized because he really understands and believes in Mormonism, or because he is an orphan and a foreigner with no realistic alternative---and who wants to please his aunt and uncle on top of that? Is Paul getting baptized because he really understands and believes in Mormonism, or because that is the environment in which he was raised?

In any case, Larry and Paul both live in or near Salt Lake City. The Church does not hide or downplay any of the problem areas with its faith-promoting narrative. Larry and Paul could have gone down to the Church History Library and looked through old manuscripts and microfilm to learn about all these things. They freely chose to be in the circumstances they were in at age seven. If someday they find troubling things about the faith in which they were raised, clearly they have no one to blame but themselves.

Darth J, if I might be permitted to use Mormon-speak for a moment: Your brilliance knows no bounds, you enlighten us like the morning sun.*

(*The sentiments are genuine even if no sincere person speaks that way.)

I am re-thinking my criticism of whether at 8 years old an individual may make an eternity-lasting decision. After all, many parents, Mormon and gentile alike, think if they don't get their child into the right pre-school and kindergarten that the child's entire life will be ruined. We just need to adjust our thinking that if we don't enroll our 8 year olds in COJCOLDS, they will forever--even after becoming gods--be behind their peers who did join COJCOLDS at 8 years of age.
Post Reply