MCB wrote:Interesting insight. Yes, there would be no understanding of the meaning of the story, thus no expression, other than with the mouth.Maybe it was the subject under discussion at the time?
That phenomena isn't confined to Mormons though.
MCB wrote:Interesting insight. Yes, there would be no understanding of the meaning of the story, thus no expression, other than with the mouth.Maybe it was the subject under discussion at the time?
I think our friend TAO is aware of that. Mormonism certainly likes to see people with autistic characteristics kept in the dark.That phenomena isn't confined to Mormons though.
MCB wrote:I think our friend TAO is aware of that. Mormonism certainly likes to see people with autistic characteristics kept in the dark.That phenomena isn't confined to Mormons though.
And many other secrets. Inner core Mormons=Gadiantons, anyone?It's one of the reasons we have no annual financial report.
Simon Belmont wrote: Without any evidence whatsoever that the claims are true, I don't see why they should be posted.
Some Schmo wrote:Simon Belmont wrote: Without any evidence whatsoever that the claims are true, I don't see why they should be posted.
Good. I'm glad we agree on that. I trust you'll now quit talking about mor.mon claims on this board since, ya know, it's as offensive to me the same way Scratch's claims are offensive to you.
Doctor Scratch wrote:In what sense do you think that Mormon apologetics--and the various bureaucracies, institutions, practices, and people associated with it--is comparable with "unicorns"?
Simon Belmont wrote:Doctor Scratch wrote:In what sense do you think that Mormon apologetics--and the various bureaucracies, institutions, practices, and people associated with it--is comparable with "unicorns"?
The truthfulness of your TMZ "intel" is comparable with "unicorns," since neither exist.
Simon Belmont wrote: Um.... the Mormon capitalization thing doesn't exist anymore. And if it's offensive to you, you are welcome to not read it. This is, after all, Mormon discussions.
Simon Belmont wrote: Without any evidence whatsoever that the claims are true, I don't see why they should be posted.
Some Schmo wrote:Good. I'm glad we agree on that. I trust you'll now quit talking about mor.mon claims on this board since, ya know, it's as offensive to me the same way Scratch's claims are offensive to you.
Simon Belmont wrote:Um.... the Mormon capitalization thing doesn't exist anymore. And if it's offensive to you, you are welcome to not read it. This is, after all, Mormon discussions.