Doctor Scratch wrote:That's not a very good analogy, TAO. For your analogy to work, I would need to have something--a unicorn horn, say--that would definitively prove the informants' allegations false. DCP and the apologists have such things: budget plans/statements, FARMS editorial remarks, etc., but they refuse to use them (which is their prerogative, of course). DCP et al. *could* definitely show that my "intel" is totally false, but they refuse to do that. What you're proposing above is based on a scenario in which the claims are totally unfalsifiable, and that's just not the same thing.
Budget Plans, Statements, FARMS Editorial Remarks, etc, those are the sorta things that DCP probably wants kept private either A) because it's a pre-made agreement or B) because he doesn't like handing them out or C) because they would be claimed to be Photoshopped, which is pretty easy in my opinion.
But I wondered if you/Simon were perhaps citing a "unicorn" for other (perhaps inadvertent) reasons.
???
I was just using Unicorn so it made sense with Simon's example... I don't really like the use of unicorn actually myself.