Palin/Romney in 2010

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Palin/Romney in 2010

Post by _bcspace »

A Saint compared to Obama (and more experienced).

More experienced? She was only governor for three years. Alaska has the population of a small town.


More governing experience than ACORN worker Obama had and continues to have. Plus, Obama never really did anything good or noteworthy in the Senate except bide his time. But it's stances on the issues that most concern me. All KG can talk about are neologisms.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Palin/Romney in 2010

Post by _Buffalo »

bcspace wrote:
More governing experience than ACORN worker Obama had and continues to have. Plus, Obama never really did anything good or noteworthy in the Senate except bide his time.


Obama was a state senator for a real state, and then a US Senator. That Trump's being mayor of Mayberry any day of the week.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bi ... tes_Senate
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_cinepro
_Emeritus
Posts: 4502
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm

Re: Palin/Romney in 2010

Post by _cinepro »

Joseph wrote:Arnie is not a natural born citizen. This keeps him from the Presidency. It does not keep him from being VP.


12th Amendment says it does.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Palin/Romney in 2010

Post by _Quasimodo »

bcspace wrote:A Saint compared to Obama (and more experienced).


Yes, please, please, please, can we have Sarah as the Republican nominee? It would guarantee Obama a second term.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Palin/Romney in 2010

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

I swear, if the Republicans put Palin on the ticket, I'm leaving the party.
_Calculus Crusader
_Emeritus
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:52 am

Re: Palin/Romney in 2010

Post by _Calculus Crusader »

I don't want Sarah Palin or Empty Suit Romney as the Republican nominee.
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei

(I lost access to my Milesius account, so I had to retrieve this one from the mothballs.)
_Calculus Crusader
_Emeritus
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:52 am

Re: Palin/Romney in 2010

Post by _Calculus Crusader »

Kevin Graham wrote:
I haven't seen anything wrong yet with Palin's stances on the issues



Except that she's a complete moron and a compulsive liar?

She just won the Glenn Beck Misinformer of the Year Award.

Here is a huge list of lies she has propagated over the past year:

http://mediamatters.org/research/201012220006


Palin is neither a complete moron nor a compulsive liar. She is gaffe-prone though (but no more so than Biden).
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei

(I lost access to my Milesius account, so I had to retrieve this one from the mothballs.)
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Palin/Romney in 2010

Post by _Quasimodo »

Calculus Crusader wrote::

Palin is neither a complete moron nor a compulsive liar. She is gaffe-prone though (but no more so than Biden).


Not a complete moron, but she seems to be working hard towards that goal. Her lying may not be compulsive, but she does spend some time doing that.

Poor Sarah is just misunderstood. Everyone knows that killing animals for fun (wolves, moose, deer, bears, etc.) is every American's right.

Resigning as the Alaskan Governor for profit is the American way. Using her children to gain media attention is perfectly natural.

Not reading newspapers or understanding the fundamentals of our political system is the norm in the general public (who reads newspapers anymore?).

The perfect Republican candidate.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Palin/Romney in 2010

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

Quasimodo wrote:
Calculus Crusader wrote::

Palin is neither a complete moron nor a compulsive liar. She is gaffe-prone though (but no more so than Biden).


Not a complete moron, but she seems to be working hard towards that goal. Her lying may not be compulsive, but she does spend some time doing that.

Poor Sarah is just misunderstood. Everyone knows that killing animals for fun (wolves, moose, deer, bears, etc.) is every American's right.

Resigning as the Alaskan Governor for profit is the American way. Using her children to gain media attention is perfectly natural.

Not reading newspapers or understanding the fundamentals of our political system is the norm in the general public (who reads newspapers anymore?).

The perfect Republican candidate.


That’s such BS.

People love to act like they’d be paragons of wit and thoughtfulness if they had the same focus from the media on them. It would be far different story if you had people constantly parsing your speech, looking for mistakes. The longer you talk, the closer the chance you’ll say something stupid rises to 1.

It’s the mother of all naïveté to think you can accurately deduce a person’s character and intelligence via media presentation (pro and con), because it’s nothing but a circus where showmanship and rhetoric make all the difference, and those two qualities are far from synonymous with intelligence. It’s nothing but a base and discredited form of behaviorism that was perfected on Bush, and now it’s being used on Palin.

Behind every media personality, there is a teeming network of circus masterminds and roustabouts, who handle the person and try to craft public perception to fit an agenda. Everything from public relations firms, pollsters, policy wonks, and intern fact checkers. CC was right to point out that Palin is gaffe prone, and she either has a bad team of people behind her, or she just ignores her handlers, which spells doom for her anyways.

I’m amazed you think anyone at her level of media attention would actually read a newspaper. People like her, and Obama, and every right or left leaning pundit who does a daily show doesn’t read a paper either, they have teams of researches pouring over publications and blogs for them, and bringing them relevant material.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Palin/Romney in 2010

Post by _Quasimodo »

MrStakhanovite wrote:

That’s such b***s***.


Obviously I didn't think it bs, or I wouldn't have posted it.

people love to act like they’d be paragons of wit and thoughtfulness if they had the same focus from the media on them. It would be far different story if you had people constantly parsing your speech, looking for mistakes. The longer you talk, the closer the chance you’ll say something stupid rises to 1.


Palin chose to enter the world of fame. I think she likes the negative attention and tries to use it to her advantage (lame media). It works well with the Tea Party folks. If you're going to enter politics, you had better be prepared to deal with scrutiny.
It’s the mother of all naïveté to think you can accurately deduce a person’s character and intelligence via media presentation (pro and con), because it’s nothing but a circus where showmanship and rhetoric make all the difference, and those two qualities are far from synonymous with intelligence. It’s nothing but a base and discredited form of behaviorism that was perfected on Bush, and now it’s being used on Palin.


My judgement of Palin's intellect comes from her own statements. Not from media's parsing.

Behind every media personality, there is a teeming network of circus masterminds and roustabouts, who handle the person and try to craft public perception to fit an agenda. Everything from public relations firms, pollsters, policy wonks, and intern fact checkers. CC was right to point out that Palin is gaffe prone, and she either has a bad team of people behind her, or she just ignores her handlers, which spells doom for her anyways.


Some of her political aids have resigned due to her unwillingness to follow their advice.

I’m amazed you think anyone at her level of media attention would actually read a newspaper. People like her, and Obama, and every right or left leaning pundit who does a daily show doesn’t read a paper either, they have teams of researches pouring over publications and blogs for them, and bringing them relevant material.


I would expect a former mayor and former governor to try to keep up with the news. She has no office at the moment and it would be reasonable to expect that she would have the time to read even her local paper.

Even you said you would leave the party if she were nominated.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
Post Reply