Evidence Mounts: Ayers Co-Wrote Obama's Dream
American Thinker March 18, 2011
One response to Jack Cashill's article
"“Evidence continues to mount” that Cashill’s repeated assertion of an Obama-Ayers link is a deliberately perpetrated fraud, pursued in conscious bad faith. The initial article, while demonstrably untethered from reality, seemed at least to be a plausible product of a lonely fixation. Cashill’s second piece contains clearer indications that his attempted smear job is a calculated one.
Cashill keeps up the pretence of a serious inquiry, citing pieces of “evidence” which supposedly bolster an argument for which he has never provided any support to begin with. He takes passages from long-published works which he has only lately noticed, and calls them “new discoveries” and “revelations.” He takes Rashid Khalidi’s passing reference to Ayers (among others) in an acknowledgments section, and, based on this alone, spins the idea that Ayers had a “famed dining room table” for “would-be authors of a leftist bent.” This “fame” exists only in Cashill’s own mind. But he isn’t letting that stop him.
In treating Obama’s 1990 book chapter as another piece of “evidence,” Cashill is up to the same sleight-of-hand as before – taking an absence of evidence of literary qualities and treating it as evidence of absence. A good-faith reader would expect great differences between a chapter of a topical anthology on community organizing and a carefully crafted personal memoir. Is Obama’s earlier chapter as bad as Cashill’s examples indicate? Perhaps so, but Cashill has already shown that he is not to be trusted on such matters.
Time after time, the gap between “evidence” and claim is so wide that it exposes the falseness of Cashill’s pose as literary investigator. A few examples of word choice supposedly show that Ayers “rewrote [Obama’s] text.” Obama’s ordinary use of the word “ballast” supposedly reflects Ayers’ experience as a seaman. Cashill keeps trying to make a case based on bits and pieces of things, like the word “trap,” or various “nautical metaphors.” Any serious comparison of these two texts would consider broader themes and more meaningful patterns
Bill Ayers response
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and- ... e-blogger/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/0 ... 12954.html
Hilary Clinton " I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP.I won in places are optimistic diverse, dynamic, moving forward"