Who is Wade Englund?

[_EAllusion]

Save your breath, Droopy. EA is obviouisly a throw-back to the early 70's, and has been so demasculated by bad feminism as to mis-think homosexuality is sacrosanct and above criticism, and thus even the slightest expressed aversion to anything about them is deserving of the patented 70's response--contemptously dismiss it as BIGOTRY!!

So you've bounced back from arguing that you were only talking about the gays you know in your oddly fidgeting explanation for why you don't spend lonely nights contemplating if you like tops or bottoms better to acknowledging that you were talking about gays in general.

That's progress, I guess.

[_Buffalo]

[Guest]

Those who presume that a brief list of repelling behaviors is indicative of anthrope, particularly when clearly and repeatedly clarified to the contrary, are divided against reason (you've been busted Nightlion"), and do themselves a disservice by saying anything, let alone further. LOL

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Hardly, and I do not believe for a second that you LOLed at what you wrote.

Listing repulsive behaviors of men and women CANNOT be clarified to the contrary of misanthropy. There is no such a word as anthrope.

I think your number is that of one who loves to imagine seeing himself deftly able to parry off every foe like you were, oh, just a guess, Errol Flynn lets say. What a fantasy. Do you see yourself in green tights?

Okay, so don't even pretend to laugh at the Nightlion. Now. back to keeping all those dishes spinning in you little UNICIRCUS.

[_Buffalo]

Hardly, and I do not believe for a second that you LOLed at what you wrote.

Listing repulsive behaviors of men and women CANNOT be clarified to the contrary of misanthropy. There is no such a word as anthrope.

I think your number is that of one who loves to image seeing himself deftly able to parry off every foe like you were, oh, just a guess, Errol Flynn lets say. What a fantasy. Do you see yourself in green tights?

Okay, so don't even pretend to laugh at the Nightlion. Now. back to keeping all those dishes spinning in you little UNICIRCUS.

Don't tempt Wade with impure thoughts, now.

[_wenglund]

Um....he did what you just did. Are you bigoted?

The answer, I suppose, depends upon who you ask. If Scheech supposedly did what I just did, and since EA and Beastie (and in a way Blixa) viewed me as bigotted for doing what I did, then consistency would necessitate that they consider him bigotted as well. So far, though, the PC trio have been conspicuously silent regarding schreech.

Someone called Schreeches comments an object lesson, and I am inclined to agree--the object being selective indignation.

As for myself, I don't view his comments as bigotted, but rather mistaken and entirely meaningless to me--which turns out to be another object lesson, though I won't be so charitable as to spell it out.

That's the trouble with Disfunctional and Delusional Sects; moonies, Branch Davidians, Heaven's Gate, and Mormonism. They see persecution where none exists.

What makes this comment ooze with unwitting irony isn't just that it was made on a thread devoted to mocking me, though where over the last several days former members have been in a fit of self-righteous indignation over a presumed personal affront to themselves and all humanity, but statements like what you just made have yet to prompt even the slightest raise of the eyebrow. It is as though the rank hypocracy was intentional--a kind of self-paroday as it were. Funny stuf!!

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_thews]

What makes this comment ooze with unwitting irony isn't just that it was made on a thread devoted to mocking me, though where over the last several days former members have been in a fit of self-righteous indignation over a presumed personal affront to themselves and all humanity, but statements like what you just made have yet to prompt even the slightest raise of the eyebrow. It is as though the rank hypocrisy was intentional--a kind of self-paroday as it were. Funny stuf!!

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Please answer my question Wade, as you see yourself a person knowledgeable enough to give advice. What would you do, hypothetically, if you were gay?

[_thews]

Hardly, and I do not believe for a second that you LOLed at what you wrote.

Listing repulsive behaviors of men and women CANNOT be clarified to the contrary of misanthropy. There is no such a word as anthrope.

I think your number is that of one who loves to image seeing himself deftly able to parry off every foe like you were, oh, just a guess, Errol Flynn lets say. What a fantasy. Do you see yourself in green tights?

Okay, so don't even pretend to laugh at the Nightlion. Now. back to keeping all those dishes spinning in you little UNICIRCUS.

You rock Nightlion... that was funny.

[_wenglund]

Hardly, and I do not believe for a second that you LOLed at what you wrote.

Of course you don't. Nor should you. This is one of the key points of this thread--i.e. ignore everything Wade says about and for himself, and stick with whatever pre-concieved notions you had about him, because, of course, you all know him so much better than he knows himself (or at least that is the party line around here).

(P.S. Sorry, I forgot the "mis" prefix to "anthropic".)

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_beastie]

As for myself, I don't view his comments as bigotted, but rather mistaken and entirely meaningless to me--which turns out to be another object lesson, though I won't be so charitable as to spell it out.

Oh, for heaven's sake, Wade, he was parodying YOU. As was Spurven.

[_wenglund]

Please answer my question Wade, as you see yourself a person knowledgeable enough to give advice. What would you do, hypothetically, if you were gay?

I would, hypotheticaly speaking, take the advise that I would give to anyone who is gay, and that is: first, don't define yourself by your sexual orientation, but rather by your prevailing character; and second, for your own sake and best interest, rise above your demonstrably unhealthy inclinations and do those things, or rather work at developing those kinds of relationships that are designed to grow us in Godly love and familial joy (see Gen. 2:24 and Mt. 19:15.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-