In the 70s, a gay man participated in an experiment that involved extreme operant conditioning. He was exposed to pornographic images women and heterosexual intercourse while the part of his brain responsible for positive reinforcement was stimulated.
The next level of the experiment involved him having intercourse with a prostitute while having his brain stimulated.
As the experiment progressed, it seemed to be working. He had an increasing attraction towards women. Of course, he never lost his attraction for men. Essentially, he became bisexual, carrying on an affair with a woman while still sleeping with men.
The unethical aspects of this experiment are widely understood, and I think are obvious to anyone. Wade Englund's attitude and approach highlight many of the unethical aspects, unfortunately.
To demand homosexuals participate in heterosexual relationships, in any form, is to demand that they be unhappy for the rest of their lives. It is to suggest that they do not deserve the same happiness and close relationships that everyone else has the opportunity to experience.
To make attempts, however you disguise them, to deny them equality and fairness, is to demonstrate that you consider them inferior in someway, which makes you a bigot and a hypocrite of the highest order.
Consider the fact that God, if he existed, created them that way, and God does not need you or anyone else meddling in other people's lives.
In other words, let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
Also, for the consideration of those who think homosexuality is a choice:
"Homosexuality is not purely the result of DNA, since identical twins are not always both gay. However, there is a much greater chance that twins will share the same sexuality. This is fact. More than a few studies have confirmed this correlation.
There is a clear link between certain groupings of genes and homosexuality which clearly suggest that epigenetics are playing an important role. These genes also correlate to female fertility. The more fertile a woman is, the more likely she is going to have gay children. Homosexuality has a stronger link to the mother's side than the father's. Basically, studies have found that homosexual men had more gay male uncles and cousins on the maternal side of the family than on the paternal side.
As if that wasn't enough, the most obvious demonstration that there is a biological basis is the birth order correlation. Each older brother increases the odds of a man being gay by 33%. This is now "one of the most reliable epidemiological variables ever identified in the study of sexual orientation." To explain this finding, it has been proposed that male fetuses provoke a maternal immune reaction that becomes stronger with each successive male fetus. Male fetuses produce HY antigens which are "almost certainly involved in the sexual differentiation of vertebrates." It is this antigen which maternal H-Y antibodies are proposed to both react to and 'remember'. Successive male fetuses are then attacked by H-Y antibodies which somehow decrease the ability of H-Y antigens to perform their usual function in brain masculinisation.
Attraction between two people occurs on a biological level. This has been proven in a number of areas. The nose knows more about a potential mate than any other sense. In this regard, yet another biological basis for homosexuality has been established. Recent research has suggested that gay and straight men respond differently to two odors that are believed to be involved in sexual arousal. The research showed that when both heterosexual women and gay men are exposed to a testosterone derivative found in men's sweat, a region in the hypothalamus is activated. Heterosexual men, on the other hand, have a similar response to an estrogen-like compound found in women's urine. The conclusion is that sexual attraction, whether same-sex or opposite-sex oriented, operates similarly on a biological level.
But it gets worse for the Christians. More than one study has confirmed that the suprachiasmatic nucleus is larger in size in homosexual men than it is in heterosexual men. In many cases, you can see homosexuality in a brain scan. Gay men and straight women have, on average, equally proportioned brain hemispheres. Lesbian women and straight men have, on average, slightly larger right brain hemispheres.
Gay men and lesbians are significantly more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous than non-gay men and women. Gay men have increased ridge density in the fingerprints on their left thumbs and pinkies. Length of limbs and hands of gay men is smaller compared to height than the general population, but only among white men. The startle response is similarly masculinized in lesbians and bisexual women. The list goes on and on like this, clearly, definitively and certainly proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is a biological basis for homosexuality.
Of course, the factors involved are somewhat complex, but the data can be interpreted no other way. The people who think homosexuality is a choice are all wrong. Thought and behavior are determined by the biology of our bodies and the brain inside those bodies."