Molok wrote:Great. Terrific. Can we get out of the Middle East now, or are we going to stay so we can make a whole new generation of Osama Bin Ladens?
Good question!
Molok wrote:Great. Terrific. Can we get out of the Middle East now, or are we going to stay so we can make a whole new generation of Osama Bin Ladens?
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Somebody, quick, shoot me as I am about to find myself in agreement with ... with ... stem. Please, hurry, shoot, there's no time to spare. Oops, there it is: I agree with stem.stemelbow wrote:What does nearly 10 years in hiding say about US intelligence? I don't know, but it scares me a little. Perhaps I'm too indoctrinated with Hollywood ideas of military intelligence or something.
The vast celebrations are more depressing and discouraging than they are exalting, I think.
Skepticism does not have to be considered negative. I actually suspect that the euphoric celebrations have something else to account for them. Most of the angst towards bin Laden personally dissipated long ago.stemelbow wrote:After reading what I just wrote: man, I'm far more negative then I give myself credit for.
Buffalo wrote:In before Droopy or BC Space give credit to Bush.
stemelbow wrote:What does nearly 10 years in hiding say about US intelligence? I don't know, but it scares me a little. Perhaps I'm too indoctrinated with Hollywood ideas of military intelligence or something.
Chap wrote:Of course Bush should get no credit...
And, to be perfectly, frank, don't you think the problem was more one of a significant faction in the state of Pakistan shielding bin Laden?